Isn't it all the same. Either way, innocence is being killed.
2007-08-24 07:08:00 · 24 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Both bother me actually.
The problem is those who have so much concern about the Iraqi people couldn't care less about unborn people have their limbs ripped off or their brains sucked out of their heads.
Despite liberal insistence a fetus is indeed a human being in one of the many stages of growth that we all go through. It may be comforting to delude ones self into believing it is simply a glob of cells but it just isn't so. Antone who picks up a science book would realize that.
2007-08-24 07:14:36 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
What are you babbling about.
Accept for a BELIEF,you have no evidence whatsoever that a fetus before gestation is either "human" or "innocent" for innocence is a function of being human .
It is soley a religious belief that life begins at conception.
Many others including many religious people including Jews believe life begins only at birth.
Some other religious people consider the egg and sperm life in and of themselves before a zygote is created .The Biblical justification for this is not wasting ones seed on barren land .I.E.The sperm is as much a human as the born child is.
Given this,why don't you post some more of your moralizing crap calling masterbaters KILLERS as well !!!!!!
What bloody right do YOU or anyone has in telling others what is right or wrong ,what they can do or not do WHEN THERE IS NO CONCENSUS WHATSOEVER ON WHEN LIFE BEGINS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The over 400,000 INNOCENT Iraqi civilians that have been slaughtered by the war mongering Bush's illegal war of choice ,WERE LIVING HUMAN BEINGS WITHOUT QUESTION and you flippantly erroneously and contemptuously but them in the same category as fetuses .
Take your moralizing,holier-than-thou ,sanctimonious BELIEF elsewhere and come back ONLY when you have PROOF that the fetus is a "live human" like those 400,000 innocent Iraqis were.
2007-08-24 08:00:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Who's upset about the number of Iraqi's dead ?
Maybe some other rag-heads?
Maybe , if Saddam's mother had access to abortion, GW wouldn't have taken us in there anyway.
If there were such a thing as "Libs", why would they be more interested in the Iraqi deaths than one of your so-called,"Compassionate Conservatives " ??
Plus, who told you Liberals weren't upset by aborted babies? I think they abhor that practice just as much as anyone, but defend the woman's right to choose!
2007-08-24 09:23:41 · answer #3 · answered by thehermanator2003 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do you get upset over aborting babies and not dead Iraqis? Isn't it the same? Either way, innocence is being killed. See how easy it is to ask a stupid, trolling question?
2007-08-24 07:22:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Many of them care absolutely nothing for Iraqi children. IF they did they would be willing to continue the US effort in ridding that country of terrorists and helping secure a decent, peaceable future for that nation. They play lip service to ideas like "freedom", "justice", "opportunity", "equality". Their generosity extends only as far as they can reap political power and gain from the millions of Americans they keep in their debt by keeping them on the public dole.
2007-08-24 07:52:55 · answer #5 · answered by fruitypebbles 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am a Democrat, against the killing of innocent Iraqis and pro-life
2007-08-24 07:17:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
Your assumption is incorrect. Everyone is "bothered" by abortion. Just because we believe in choice, doesn't mean we applaud abortion, simply that we feel it is a personal choice. Perhaps if you had some testosterone, you wouldn't ask such inane questions. I could also ask why do Cons get upset over abortion but are not at all bothered by the 600,000 plus dead Iraqis? See, it goes both ways.
2007-08-24 07:16:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why do conservative trolls - like yourself - get their tighty whities all in a knot over abortion, but apparently have NO problem with the fact that the good ol' USA has the highest teen pregnancy rate on the planet...while the Netherlands - where they take contraception and sex education seriously - has the LOWEST rate?
Why is that?????????
2007-08-24 13:09:04 · answer #8 · answered by John Doe 1st 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
your question is comparing apples and oranges.
I could say why do conservatives love getting people killed in Iraq but not support abortion since it is all just killing.
2 different issues that are not really connected by anything other than death.
Oh and for record..I am not personally a supporter of abortion..but I acknowledge that I have to right to tell a woman what to do with HER body which is why I am pro-choice. Because what she does with her body is between her and her beliefs....you..should have nothing to do with it.
Here's another connection between abortion and Iraq...STICKING OUR NOSES WHERE THEY DON'T BELONG
2007-08-24 07:29:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Another simpleton awed by pulpit ranting on Sundays.
And how do you "know" they are "not at all" bothered?
A pregnant woman has the right, by law, to consider her body 1 being that the government can stay out of.
Plus, you avatar and screen name are even crazier than this absurd question.
2007-08-24 07:15:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋