The people that want safety for our troops, tax dollars to stay in America fo rthe benifit of our country.
And then the war mongor woosies (with a capitol "P"). they can go fight the big lie wars, and waste their own money on big mother of all bombers, bombs, and bullets.
2007-08-24 06:21:19 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
so you're saying logical vs loony? Not a bad idea.
2007-08-24 06:26:28 · answer #1 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they already are. Remember the voter map that showed the states that supported Bush? all the low lying states were on his side, high ground states opposed him. I can't wait for global warming to push sea level up 10 more feet and do away with THEM.
2007-08-24 13:30:37 · answer #2 · answered by Alan S 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Two Parts:
Part One: The people that follow blindly
Part Two: The people that don't support the current Administration.
2007-08-24 13:27:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Depends who you aks.
A liberals will typicall say no. People are individuals with varying opinions.
A con will tell you yes. They only see the world in black and white. They only see opponents of the war as traitors and terrorists. They only see welfare supporters as communists.
So to answer your question......yes and no.
2007-08-24 19:34:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, that's a nice concept but what about the people that are not decided???Who or what would determine where they go???I think that it should be you because you have common sense.
2007-08-24 22:36:33 · answer #5 · answered by Jones 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's called Darwinism at work.
2007-08-24 13:32:02 · answer #6 · answered by Rae 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We already have. That is the major problem. Too many radicals.
2007-08-24 13:34:28 · answer #7 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can we? I thought we already did.
2007-08-24 13:27:45 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋