English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the only thing i've ever seen my parents vote for was in the last two presidential elections. if it came down to a decision to impeach Bush or legalize marajuanna, would there be a nationwide vote? i'm not sure my civics teachers in middle school were educated at all.

2007-08-24 02:23:15 · 9 answers · asked by jimmy j 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Would people vote on it, or would their senator simply act in their best interest?

2007-08-24 02:24:01 · update #1

And i never hear on the news "today the polls are open to vote for, ETC"

2007-08-24 02:34:20 · update #2

9 answers

Well I got to vote on the gay marrige issue not long ago. We get to vote on state issues, not federal. As much as I would like issues like abortion, the death penalty, gun control etc. put before us at a national level, I am afraid the team with the most money would win and it would not come out as to what the public really wants. I would not mind if those issues were voted for state by state though. If the death penalty can be, why not abortion?

2007-08-24 02:44:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The House Impeaches, the Senator Convicts in terms of impeachment of an elected official, the general public does not vote.

In terms of legalizing marajuana, that would just be a change in current law, so again The House and The Senate would be the ones to vote on the new law, then the President would need to sign it.

Normally, in general elections, you vote for candidates for local, state and national office (Mayor and city council, Governor and state representatives, as well as members of The House of Representatives, The Senate and The President/Vice President).

There are often city, county or state ballot initiatives (such as allocation of funds to build new highways, or even things like recognition of gay marriage - that was on the ballot in some states in the last election).

It is the job of the Senators and Representatives we elect to represent us, their constituents, in their votes in the Senate and House respectively. That's why it's so important to vote. You have the job of picking who will represent you in voting for laws and policies. If you don't vote, you let someone else make the decision for you.

I hope this helps!

2007-08-24 02:30:09 · answer #2 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1 0

Voting on issues would require several trips to the polling place.
Given that only 22% of the population participates in general elections and less when a presidential seat is not on the ballot, try to imagine how few people would bother to vote on off-year referendums.

What you would end up with is a small group of professional voters supported by some interest group or corporate concern.

As a matter of fact, that's what we have now. We call it the house of representatives.

2007-08-24 02:29:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That's the reason why we vote for representatives. They are placed into office to represent the best interests of their constituents. Unfortunately, too many have been in office long enough to sell themselves out to special interest groups and big business. We, are no longer receiving representation.

2007-08-24 02:28:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I agree approximately each and all the smoke. extremely everyone hates Bush yet in actuality inventory markets hit all time highs in his first 6 years, monetary device grew to become into doing nicely, human beings needed substitute, they have been given it, the democrats took over congress 2 years in the past and look at what has occurred! George Bush has been in place of work for 7 a million/2 years. the 1st six the monetary device grew to become into nice. a sprint over one 12 months in the past: a million) client self belief stood at a 2 a million/2 12 months severe; 2) customary gas bought for $2.19 a gallon; 3) the unemployment value grew to become into 4.5%. 4) the DOW JONES hit a checklist severe--14,000 + 5) American's have been procuring new vehicles,taking cruises, trip trips distant places, residing great!... yet American's needed 'substitute'! So, in 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress and specific--we've been given 'substitute' all appropriate. in the previous 12 months: &n bsp; a million) client self belief has plummeted ; 2) gas is now over $4 a gallon & mountaineering!; 3) Unemployment is as much as 5.5% (a 10% improve); 4) human beings have considered their residing house fairness drop by employing $12 TRILLION &nb sp; money and expenses s until eventually dropping; 5) a million% of yankee residences are in foreclosures. 6) as I write, THE DOW is probing yet another low~~ $2.5 TRILLION money HAS EVAPORATED FROM THEIR shares, BONDS & MUTUAL money investment PORTFOLIOS! specific, IN 2006 u.s. VOTED FOR substitute...AND WE useful have been given IT! ..... undergo in strategies THE PRESIDENT HAS NO administration OVER ANY of those=2 0ISSUES, purely CONGRESS. AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS completed in the final 2 YEARS, extremely not something. How plenty extra "substitute" do we cope with? thank you ssg_butcher!

2016-10-03 04:21:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

We live a republic and not a democracy. We choose people to handle our business for us. If we actually voted on issues it would lead to an unstable government and eventually anarchy.

2007-08-24 02:30:45 · answer #6 · answered by Jason 2 · 1 2

Why do people vote at all?
There is no one in politics that cares about truth any more.

2007-08-24 02:38:03 · answer #7 · answered by harshmistressmoon 4 · 0 1

people DO vote on issues -- on the LOCAL level

2007-08-24 02:44:44 · answer #8 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 0 0

...Impeachment cant be voted in.. Its the prosecution of a provable crime...

2007-08-24 02:40:18 · answer #9 · answered by Antiliber 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers