Do those who have taken their place good enough?
2007-08-23 22:44:00 · 18 answers · asked by karikalan 7 in Sports ➔ Cricket
I think they would have been useful in T20 World cup next month.
2007-08-23 22:50:38 · update #1
Neither are good fielders and Razzaq is a very very poor fielder who can at times give away more runs while fielding than he can contribute with batting or bowling. The team has to bat out only 20 overs so some one like Mohammed Yousef is also not of much use and what is needed the most is a very good and atheletic fielding set up to save the runs. Almost Baseball type fielding and atheletism is needed.
Both are very very good players to have in test matches and ODI's. Who would not want them in a team anyway. They are both a pleasure to watch irrespective of nationality.
Comming to 20 20 cricket ,no matter what you bowl it is going to be hit, the problem with Indian and Pakistani teams is that they are turning into a flat batting bullies. The big guns of India get runs only on very flat surfaces or on very small grounds. The viewers are fooled anyway
2007-08-25 21:55:17 · answer #1 · answered by Rej 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so far, Pakistan team has been most affected by the ICL.So far ,indian team has not been much affected by the ICL thing.Md Yosuf is the key and important batsman for Pakistan.He was the prolific batsman for Pakistan in 2006 ,scored that record no of centuries.So his left out of team is a big blow for Pakistan team.Same with the case of Razzaq.
2007-08-24 07:19:45 · answer #2 · answered by rkrish79 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is a wrong decision coz Razzack is an all rounder and Yousuf is a very good batsman , he is top ten batsmans .
This is a wrong decision to leave out Razzack,Md Yousuf
2007-08-24 06:40:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Leaving out razzaq was a big mistake.
Md Yousf is a classic batsmen but I don't think he will be of any use in a 20-20 pakistan squad.
A 20-20 game needs someone like Afridi, Sehwag, Dhoni - people who can slog and not people who play classic strokes.
2007-08-24 05:54:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Razzack is capable of big hitting also useful as a bowler.
Md Yousuf can steady an innings and also can increase the tempo after an over or two.
A wrong decision.
2007-08-25 11:56:58 · answer #5 · answered by bhishma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pakistan cricket made a big blunder to leave razzack and yousuf...They have lost a great middle order batsman and a great finisher of the matches.....
So i think they are wrong to leave razzack and yousuf.....
2007-08-24 15:16:18 · answer #6 · answered by jeba 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have no idea who have replaced these two players...but for Yousef i would say he is a careful player and actualy does not suit the 20/20 type of game..one need to be aggresive and careless of losing the wicket in 20/20 ..and for razzaq..don't know his form these days..but he is a good player and aggresive many times...and he could be a better choice for 20/20....but see what other players can do to justify their place in the team !atleast they should ahve kept razzaq for this cup ! but i don't think it would make a huge difference to keep him off the team !
2007-08-24 13:32:40 · answer #7 · answered by ★Roshni★ 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Razzak is an average player & Yousuf, a,classical type. Pakistan always produces aggresive players & their newcomers are always hungry & eager to cement their places.
2007-08-24 06:05:18 · answer #8 · answered by saumitra s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wrong to leave out Razzack & Md,Yousuf
2007-08-24 08:05:27 · answer #9 · answered by sher ali 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
razzaq is back boon in 20/20 but yousaf is a classic player i think he is not useful in 20/20 but razzaq is neccessary .now razzaq is not in team but now also pakistan is a strong team and they ll wil 20/20
2007-08-25 01:37:59 · answer #10 · answered by raja a 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋