"Every love faces certain examination, but at present syllabus has been changed from expression of love to demonstration of money power." Is it true? If yes, why? If not, criticsize it with arguments.
2007-08-23 21:46:20 · 4 answers · asked by abanti 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The basic element of love remains uncharged.Syllabus may appear to be changed but grammar is not. By demonstrating money power you cannot overwhelm the kernel. A few outwardly signs may appear befuddled and that too for a Short time.
2007-08-27 19:00:22 · answer #1 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Love does not need money but marriage and family does need.
I don't understand the point: why many people say:
"when people speak about love marriage they must not ask about income etc; etc;"
But, whether it is love or arranged marriage you certainly need money to live. isn't?
If you don't earn how will you and your lady love will survive.
According to me there is only one negative aspect between money and love. That happens when either the boy or girl leaves his / her beloved and joins hand with another person just because he /she is rich. That is wrong!
2007-08-23 22:10:38 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well, Abanti....genuine love is not detrimental, money can't buy love & yes, love faces certain examination ~ all these come from certain human faith & I believe it.
2007-08-23 22:00:06 · answer #3 · answered by saumitra s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
money is nothing to do with the love.
2007-08-25 06:44:24 · answer #4 · answered by nomoreiaminthisworld 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋