2007-08-23 21:17:30 · 7 answers · asked by aristocrat1.0@sbcglobal.net 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Yes, absolutely. We now have the ability to count votes en masse, so the antiquated system should be given the boot.
2007-08-24 06:29:56 · answer #1 · answered by Bleh! 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No It should be modified to be based on winning Congressional districts; ie a 1 vote majority could no longer give a canidate 20+ electoral votes.
2007-08-24 01:49:21 · answer #2 · answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hell yes. It is an antiquated system that has no place in a representative government.
Presidents should have to win a majority of the popular vote, period, if no single candidate wins the popular vote, it is down to a run-off.
It is time to modernize the system.
2007-08-23 21:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by joanby 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
YES! It's a waste of tax dollars. Look at the mess we're in because of it. 2000 anyone?
2007-08-23 21:27:23 · answer #4 · answered by Your #1 fan 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely - it is totally antiquated.
Instant Runoff Voting is the fair way to go!
2007-08-23 21:25:49 · answer #5 · answered by Theresa 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes we should.
2007-08-23 21:29:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
2007-08-23 21:24:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋