Employees of a large company all choose 1 of 3 levels of health insurance coverage, for which premiums, denote

Question

Employees of a large company all choose 1 of 3 levels of health insurance coverage, for which premiums, denoted by x, are 1, 2, 3 respectively. Premiums are subject to a discount, denoted by y, of 0 for smokers and 1 for non-smokers. The joint probability density function of x and y is given by:

p(x,y) = { [(x² +y²)/31] for x = 1, 2, 3, and for y = 0, 1 }

0 otherwise

Calculate the Variance of (x – y), the total premium paid by a randomly chosen employee.

Answer 1

First, find p(x,y):
p(1,0) = 1/31; p(2,0) = 4/31; p(3,0) = 9/31;
p(1,1) = 2/31; p(2,1) = 5/31; p(3,1) = 10/31.
The problem does not give the statistical weights, such as how many people smoke and how many do not. Since Sum(p) = 1, every possible case is to be treated as equally weighted (1/6). The expected value is 1/6. So the variance is easily calculated to be:
[Sum(over all different x and y) (p - 1/6)^2]/6
= [Sum(p^2 - p/3 + 1/36)]/6
= [(1+16+81+4+25+100)/31^2 - 1/3 + 1/6]/6
= (227/961 - 1/6)/6
= 401/34596

Answer 2

the clarification our healthcare in u.s. is so high priced is that the shoppers are so some distance separated from the sellers. the persons procuring the products and centers at the instant are not doing so with their very own money. whilst there's a probable countless grant of money to pay for proceedures, the style of proceedures mandatory would be countless. whilst somebody else can pay, we take regardless of we are able to get, and as much as we could like; as quickly as we would desire to pay we save for what we choose and in basic terms take what's needed. as quickly as I pay attention human beings complaining of greed, i ponder whether those comparable human beings in basic terms take in to they choose whilst somebody else is gifting away or in the event that they take in to they are in a place to. i think the latter. Asking government to %. up greater of our expenses will in basic terms advance our expenses because of the fact it is going to on the beginning up look as though we are getting some thing for now not something. the actuality is, government will tax us all, skim off the lion's share of the loot, and ration by using necessity the candies they dole out to us. the sole thank you to perfect the blunders of the previous with reference to healthcare is to gradually get rid of Daddy Warbucks and his deep wallet from the photograph. greater government isn't the answer, much less government involvement in inner maximum judgements like who can pay for our wellness care is the sole practicable answer. --- the challenge with healthcare in u.s. is? that the shopper, that's, the entity paying the expenses is now not the affected person, yet is as a exchange a faceless paperwork be they government or inner maximum clinical wellness coverage entities. greater paperwork and greater government can not restoration this concern. From the area, "decrease than clinical wellness coverage reform, coverage firms would be prohibited from refusing assurance because of the fact of somebody’s clinical historic past or wellness threat."... "And coverage firms would be prohibited from dropping or watering down coverage for people who're or grow to be sick." So whilst the coverage firms lose each and every little thing because of the requirement to think of undesirable investments, who do you think of will prop them up financially?