English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

After her husband has had an affair that the whole world knows about??? do you really think they know the meaning of marriage?

2007-08-23 15:01:34 · 20 answers · asked by Whoooa Mule 3 in Politics & Government Politics

When you become a politician or a PUBLIC FIGURE, you are so aware of the fact that you can be exposed, so the privacy issue has no strength, I do not feel that we need to be represented by any publice figure if they knowingly commit such stupid acts, and public figures do leave an opinion on the world as to what makes up the citizens of their country.

2007-08-23 23:52:56 · update #1

20 answers

Hillary is a bad example for women. A wife should not stand for a husband who is constantly unfaithful, basically looking the other way just so she can further her political career. She is condoning things that women should not allow to happen by her non-action.

2007-08-23 15:12:58 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

Isn't the meaning of marriage supposed to be "until death do us part?" Isn't it supposed to be through rough times as well as the good times? Or maybe you think it's nothing that a good divorce lawyer can't fix.

During the Lewinsky scandal is exactly when my admiration for Hillary Clinton started to grow. She carried herself with self-respect and grace while being humiliated in front of the entire world. There isn't one of us who knows what that must feel like. She will always receive my respect for that, and for doing the extremely hard work it must have required to save that marriage.

EDIT:

Armygirl

Please, get a grip on reality. Unless a woman keeps a man chained in her basement you cannot stop a man who is a cheater from roaming. You can be the best thing he's ever had in bed, but if he has a cheating nature he'll go for it simply because it's something different. Live with your eyes open, but don't think you can control a man determined to cheat, you can't.

EDIT: I agree with your add'l details comment about privacy and public life. Hillary didn't commit any stupid acts, her husband did. He is not running for President, she is. They are not Siamese twins.

2007-08-23 22:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Her marriage & relationship with her husband is really none of anyone's business. The issues are what's really important. Stop being such a shallow gossiper.

2007-08-23 22:15:02 · answer #3 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 2 0

How is marriage suppose to be. But Bill said he did not have sexual relations with the woman. Just because a court of law said it doesn't make it true.


What exactly happened?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/whatclintonsaid.htm


He did say he had improper.. but did not say sexual maybe this is just an absence of information.

She and Clinton later testified that the relationship involved oral sex, but not sexual intercourse.

you know back in the old days Jewish men had multiple wives..

2007-08-23 22:13:45 · answer #4 · answered by intracircumcordei 4 · 0 1

Actually, Hillary acted quite lady-like about that whole thing. I personally cannot even imagine the public humiliation she must have felt.

But that does not itself qualify her to be our next President, in my opinion.

2007-08-23 22:20:09 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2 1

oh like Fred Thompson and Giuliani, who married his cousin, are the prime examples of how a family should be.


Dont be hypocritical to promote the "values" party because the Vitter family is guilty too.

2007-08-23 22:08:04 · answer #6 · answered by Petey V3.3 3 · 6 0

Infidelity doesn't mean divorce.
Forgiveness is not a bad thing.
The part of the vows "for better, for worse" should be taken as seriously as "to love and to cherish".

Maybe you don't know the meaning of marriage.

2007-08-23 22:10:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

Of course! She's leading the pack now, she must be a good example of something.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/general_election_giuliani_clinton_bloomberg-344.html

2007-08-24 09:47:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Lady? I never did care for ladies; the word implies that they do not do any work. She definitely is not ladylike.
As to hers or her husbands personal life, that is their affair, not the worlds.

2007-08-23 22:07:42 · answer #9 · answered by Nothingusefullearnedinschool 7 · 5 1

No, of course not. If it were not for her desire to be supreme leader of the world she would have dumped him in a heart beat. When she loses the WH and her seat in Congress you watch, they will be splitsville.

2007-08-24 11:57:53 · answer #10 · answered by Make My Day 2 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers