English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1,000,000 to have 50 kids, would you take. But they pay for your dipers and baby stuff. Would you take it?

2007-08-23 09:46:29 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

9 answers

I have heard of twins a tripplets even sextuplets but what the heck would you call fifty

2007-08-23 09:58:03 · answer #1 · answered by Strawberry Kissez☻ 3 · 1 0

I am afraid that may not be possible in the first place! Take an average of one kid a year, that would mean fifty years...can you get my drift???

2007-08-23 17:00:26 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

NO WAY! that would hurt like hell after the first 4 O__o!!. Plus, you'd have to take care of them all your life and you'd probably die before the majority of them grew up!! AND Your life would be VERY, VERY, VERY limited... very.

-Shaii

2007-08-23 16:59:34 · answer #3 · answered by Shaii 3 · 0 0

no way. I have 2 and 1 million isn't near enough

2007-08-23 16:54:31 · answer #4 · answered by Ron B. 7 · 2 0

i dont even know if our body would allow that for any amount of money!!!
if it could, i would not have 50 kids.....

2007-08-23 16:54:02 · answer #5 · answered by New York Chic 6 · 0 0

Nope. I wouldnt do it. I would die with all that kids.

2007-08-23 16:50:33 · answer #6 · answered by FP 6 · 0 0

I already have enough kids.

2007-08-23 16:55:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Lord no.

2007-08-23 16:56:49 · answer #8 · answered by Suzanne. 6 · 2 0

no way.

2007-08-23 16:57:12 · answer #9 · answered by ♥ Plain Nikki 6 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers