English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-23 09:28:54 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science Gender Studies

Not to mention attempt to make it taboo to speak of them and pat them on the back in other threads:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AviEU7SU4iW0GuiW.srDV0QYxgt.?qid=20070823021842AAkrOcJ

2007-08-23 09:31:06 · update #1

The alternative, of course, is that hardly any of the regular posters here identifying themselves as feminists are actually feminists.

2007-08-23 09:32:31 · update #2

8 answers

You need to study the three waves of feminism and the concept of change. When one gets so adapted to how their group believes, and they change opposite of what their group believes, they get hostile really quick. Unfortunately, not everyone doesn't change and we have problems. It is unfortunate for the older feminists to see the third wave feminist movement because they fought so hard in correcting history from a man's point of view that these third wave feminists no longer care about the cause of feminism and submit to, well, mostly men. Some do it to be overpowered, others do it to overpower.

2007-08-23 09:38:34 · answer #1 · answered by wk_coe 3 · 1 1

That is like asking: How can I conclude that Muslims are against Muslim terrorists when they never condemn them?

The problem is that each group embraces a radical credo, in the case of Muslims enshrined in the Koran, and even moderates of each group say that the credo must not be questioned.

Another useful question to ask is: How many feminists know that Gloria Steinem was a CIA operative?

2007-08-23 16:46:20 · answer #2 · answered by plentino 1 · 1 1

Well obviously they are not feminist, but female sex supremacists.
But I think they arent eithier, I think those are pathetic loosers attempting to have a life on yahoo answers.
Its really sad that any attempts to have SERIOUS input is beeing tainted by those loosers with their talk about genitalia and sex.

2007-08-23 16:49:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I agree. I don't support the trolls, although I do see some truth in what they post. I would never put a troll down as a favorite, unless they were funny, and I'd point out that's why they're a favorite. Definitely a lot of winking (or worse) at misled feminism.

2007-08-23 16:49:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Okay, who are the "female sex supremacists" then? I defend the standard feminists.

2007-08-23 16:34:21 · answer #5 · answered by Rainbow 6 · 1 0

Well, they are not against them.
To a feminist, the worst woman is preferable to the best man.
It is the reason feminist organizations are rallying behind women who kill their husbands/boyfriends/children and complain when a man gets anything less than death, even when it is proven he is innocent.

2007-08-23 17:56:30 · answer #6 · answered by Phil #3 5 · 2 1

What are you talking about... feminists have nothing against S&M. As long as both parties consent, then to each his or her own!

2007-08-23 16:34:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

don't conclude.

2007-08-25 13:41:58 · answer #8 · answered by Rana 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers