My question regarding war crimes committed by Israel was removed.
Should I be shocked?
Does free speech only apply when you are rallying behind Israel as they kill Palestinians?
Is the truth so unbearable for some that they would rather not face it?
2007-08-23 08:26:49 · 9 answers · asked by ? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The original question was "Do Americans care about the war crimes committed by Israel"?
2007-08-23 08:37:47 · update #1
I don't have the answer to the conflict but I should be able to discuss what is ultimately a question about Human Rights.
2007-08-23 08:45:04 · update #2
BMCR- You cannot use yahoo answers as a platform to attack people personally as a result you have been reported. Have a wonderful day :o)
2007-08-23 16:38:27 · update #3
heck it's so hard to say i mean look at this place you got trolls asking pure junk the right wingnuts saying any thing they want then whining and reporting you if you call them on it it proves what i always said in America we have free speech...just watch what you say
2007-08-24 07:02:34 · answer #1 · answered by mason proffit 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Zionist movement in this country is so strong that there is nothing the average American congressman or senator can do to confront Israel's excesses in Palestine. Clearly there isn't anything you can do short of losing your temper and trying to rally like minded people. There are a number of us out there, looking for some guidance.
Until Israel and Palestine settle the refugee issues, there will be no peace in the region. Palestinian refugees who left the land of Israel in 1948 can never be allowed to re-settle in Israel because then Israel will lose it's Jewish majority and cease to be the Jewish homeland.
You have an answer for that? I'd sure love to hear it.
2007-08-23 08:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by David in Madison 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You are a fool since not only was your original question ridiculous but you have no concept of what FREE SPEECH means.
So, here is what it does NOT mean. Free speech does not mean that you are entitled that every free platform (e.g. Yahoo Answers) on the Internet is required to allow you to use them as a platform. They also have the freedom to do whatever the h___ they want even if it is for a trivial reason. As is the case, Yahoo Answers does have their own self governing guidelines and you probably violated it.
That being the case, all you are doing is whining.
2007-08-23 12:44:32 · answer #3 · answered by BMCR 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Who precisely is this criticism even directed at? you think of 'The Left' rule the worldwide or something? Left and genuine-wing human beings and establishments attempt to censor human beings all the time; i do no longer think of it incredibly is a bent especially relating merely one element. this could be a common refrain of yankee Conservatives who do no longer desire to be reported as racist or sexist whilst they communicate their minds - according to possibility it is the place you're coming from; i do no longer comprehend on the grounds which you probably did no longer say. yet evaluate that Conservative grassroots church lobbyists are most of the main important advocates around for the censorship of television programmes. hence I watch television earlier a definite time of day and see an unrealistic worldwide the place human beings do no longer swear or have intercourse, in assessment to the worldwide i actual stay in. i think actual you're probable a uk asker with the BNP hoo-ha in suggestions. My address it is that the BNP could desire to have been banned earlier they even have been given to run for any seats. Now that they are right here the government & media could desire to attend to them particularly. the two they're allowed to exist or no longer: there could desire to be consistency. permitting them to perform on an identical time as censoring them and singling them out for harsh medical care helps them to play the martyr and develop the myth that white each physique is the positioned-upon ethnic team in Britain, the 'silent majority'. 'loose speech' is merely an man made value; no longer something is absolute in this worldwide.
2016-10-09 02:52:37 · answer #4 · answered by severyn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yahoo is owned by people with neo-con leanings. I'm surprized I've lasted so long. I was kicked out of my hotmail account shortly after they were assimilated into MS. I dared to complin about the ammount of spam, and their apparent unwillingness to do anything about it.
2007-08-23 08:33:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Free speech is OK always, that's the whole point of it.
The first amendment is there to protect unpopular speech. Popular speech needs no protection, that's why it's popular.
2007-08-23 08:32:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Media made Israel innocent, and made Islam guilty, what a twist, ha?
I like this question.
2007-08-23 08:55:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
the guidelines are very clear
are you asking a question?
(for the questioner) this is not suppose to be a blog to voice opinion
add; was that all your question said? or did you post a bunch of rhetoric under it ...
2007-08-23 08:35:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it is not free speech, it is hate speech.
2007-08-23 09:53:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋