And if he does.....would you vote for him....or Hillary?
Or neither and why
2007-08-23 06:54:03 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
I hope he'd run. I'd vote for Gore because he actually cares. He's accomplished more than anyone of those candidates. Vote for Gore!!!
2007-08-23 07:01:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I'd like to see him run. He'd make a good spoiler for the Hillary campaign and if he's such a money whore then at least make her pay some cash too back out. It's the least he should do after Clinton ruined his 2000 bid.
Clinton and Bush families, friends forever; only the majority of baby boomers (a generation that always votes for a party ticket) can't see and comprehend their obvious cooperation. As flawed as Gore is he'd beat Hillary in California, but this state will back Obama; however Kucinich is the best Democrat candidate. The polls are complete BS, but the lie must be repeated.
If Hillary is running I'll back whatever independent, green party, peace and freedom, libertarian is on the ticket. I won't vote for that shneo-con. Billy Graham likes her though, he also liked GWB. Lots of love from the Christian Coalition.
2007-08-23 15:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by autolyceum 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm of the strong opinion the strong opinion that Al Gore will not run again. And if, by some chance, he throws his hat in, he'll never beat Hillary, who right now, looks very likely to be the Democratic candidate. (Btw, why is it that Hillary's running so strongly in national polls and, at least with the oddsmakers, is the favorite to be our next president, yet here on Yahoo Answers, I seem to be one of the few who likes her)?
2007-08-23 14:57:18 · answer #3 · answered by Stephen L 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How many times does Al Gore, and camp have to say he is not running for people to realize he is not running? If he did I would most likely vote Hillary or Ron Paul.
2007-08-23 15:20:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No he won't and I'd vote for anyone over Hillary.
The reason he won't run is that he would be crucified over the conflict of interest in his political global warming stance and the fact that he is majority owner and CEO of a carbon offset certificate company.
THe reason that I'll vote for anyone over HIllary is that she is promising to violate the Bill of Rights.
2007-08-23 14:32:44 · answer #5 · answered by Ricky T 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think he will come in at the last minute to make a dramatic run. He's ran before so everyone knows him so he doesn't have to campaign. I wouldn't vote for him, because he would spread socialism through out the energy sector, which is the wrong way to fix the problem.
In no way would I ever vote for Hillary.
I'm a libertarian, so I would vote for the most fiscally conservative candidate that believes in small gov't. So far that looks like Fred, Rudy or Mitt.
2007-08-23 14:32:38 · answer #6 · answered by gracilism 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Al Gore is not a leading candidate....
And by the way even if i am a Rep...I will give obama a try to see what he can do.
As for a woman candidate i am not against any female but Hillary is too unsure about herself and has not plans or taking the uS troops out of iraq.
2007-08-23 14:02:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. It's too late to get in for 2008, and I can't see him ever running after that.
I'm a Republican, so I'd prefer to vote for neither.
2007-08-23 14:02:17 · answer #8 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
O-Zone Al might as well hes as loony as the rest
2007-08-26 16:27:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thankfully no. As long as there is another human breathing on this earth I wouldn't vote for either one.
2007-08-23 14:11:56 · answer #10 · answered by jim h 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋