English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

oops, who's idea was it kill to the last one!

2007-08-23 05:43:45 · 11 answers · asked by . 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Now i know it's difficult for some of you, but do try and answer the question :)

2007-08-23 05:51:15 · update #1

hmmm 6 non-answers so far

2007-08-23 05:55:31 · update #2

11 answers

Yeah, for better or worse, Saddam did keep a lid on the sectarian violence and outside influences of terrorism too because he didn't want their ilk to upset his regime. The only one I can think of offhand that has gone through the same kind of CIA 'leadership' training is Osama bin Laden. No... even I can't make the stretch that this was Bush's plan all along.

2007-08-23 08:08:41 · answer #1 · answered by sagacious_ness 7 · 1 0

Saddam was a mass murderer. Not the best qualification for a leader.
The problems in Iraq will not be solved by outside forces in a few years.
Before the occupation, families had Sunni/Shiite marriages and friendships. Now families have been torn apart and the divide is the deepest it has ever been.
The Kurds thought they had it figured out with the creation of "Kurdistan". Until Turkey started bombing them recently.
I don't know the answer to a problem that has existed for 1000 years. But I do know killing is not the answer. Nor is shoving western culture into people who don't want it, understand it or agree with it.
Pray for peace.

2007-08-23 05:53:58 · answer #2 · answered by LBee 2 · 0 0

Well, Saddam killed a lot of people himself. Unfortunately, the groups were forced together for so long, I doubt a new Saddam would have a chance until the civil war winds down.

2007-08-23 05:48:36 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

We should just install a king of Iraq and give him weapons and money to be our ally and control the population with an iron fist. This is what we do with many of our other dictator allies anyway, and would be much cheaper than what we are spending now...not to mention less costly as far as american lives.

The bottomline is we want to a) control oil flow, and b) control radical islam in iraq. A king of iraq can do both of those things for us....and we can give him all sorts of money and weapons to keep the dissenters down and out.

What was that guy's name? Chalabi?

2007-08-23 05:55:56 · answer #4 · answered by bush l 1 · 0 1

Apparently.

2007-08-23 06:33:28 · answer #5 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0 0

I'd say the first one who rises up and actually takes over.
No one has done it or attempted yet.
They are holding out and allowing the US military to be offed.
To the delight of the al qeada.

2007-08-23 06:00:56 · answer #6 · answered by Nurse Winchester 6 · 0 0

Don't give them any ideas or the right wing will send billions of dollars worth of weapons and chemical weapon technology to another Sadamm just like they did before !!

2007-08-23 05:49:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It wouldn't be so difficult to answer if you would quit with the sarcasm, however, Yes another tyranical dictator is what they 'want'.

2007-08-23 05:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 1 0

oops, who's idea was it kill to the last one!>>

The Iraqi court system that found him guilty of murder.

2007-08-23 05:49:00 · answer #9 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 3 1

Yeah and could only another Hitler whack some sense into you?

2007-08-23 05:50:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers