Possible! Nothing is as it seems. Read b/w the lines.
2007-08-23 04:30:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Page 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Not necessary. The current form of governance is appropriate enough.
Property holders control the media. The government protects the interests of property holders. Why? because the media is instrumental in the electoral process. Property owners do not need to be briefed on what to do or which candidates to back up because the options are made clear by a strict two party system
You see, Orwell's imagination was on the right track. American capitalism though, has out done him. The ministry of information is not necessary when the property owners can control the media, the arms industry and the government from the secrecy of corporate boardrooms.
2007-08-23 11:39:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Washington Irving 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Ministry of miss information. Bullshitters R Us. Liars.Inc. Disney News Corporation. Lol. Not that funny since it is already happening.
2007-08-23 11:31:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by batfood1 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
I thought that had happened already. It amazes me they all report the news in the same manner. I believe they are given a sheet everyday telling them what to report and how to report it. And what they aren't allowed to report. Free Press has been a joke for awhile now.
2007-08-23 11:36:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by gone 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Those of us who've been paying attention since 2000 can see the banner already. I guess we're like Harry and Luna, we can see the thestrals...
2007-08-23 11:29:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by cassandra 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
NOT THE MINISTRY OF PROPAGANDA BUT ARM OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL.
2007-08-23 11:58:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
No because of the simple fact they want to keep up the pretense that we have a free press...........who will tell us the truth.
2007-08-23 11:35:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by honestamerican 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
Like this?:
http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminister.com/mss_history.html
2007-08-23 11:31:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
No, because that would be admitting the truth, very unlikely
2007-08-23 11:35:01
·
answer #9
·
answered by . 5
·
3⤊
1⤋