tossing his hat in the ring because the minute he does, all episodes of Law & Order he appeared in will be banned from television and ALL of his co-stars will loose their income from the royalties they would have received from the airing of those episodes?
Isn't that to his CREDIT?
2007-08-23 03:28:22 · 4 answers · asked by Philip H 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
It's true, either that or give equal time to all the other candidates. They can play them again after the election. Fred has my vote, not because he is an actor, but because of how he handled himself as US Senator, his stand on the issues, and because I think he is best suited to prevent the looming tragedy of a Hillary Clinton Presidency.
2007-08-23 03:38:56 · answer #1 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it's true. I wouldn't worry about his fellow cast members too much, Law And Order is going to be in syndication forever. And to answer Charity's question: Sad as it may be, I'm sure there will be plenty of people who'll vote for Thompson solely because they recognize him from television. Look at the groudswell of support he recieved before he voiced a single opinion. What were those early supporters basing thier support upon?
2007-08-23 03:51:18 · answer #2 · answered by fake_cowboy 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
They still ran Ronald Reagan movies on TV when he was running. Hopefully the electorate is smart enough to distinguish an actor playing a part and an actor playing presidential candidate. Since America has significantly dumbed down since Reagan ran maybe there is something to be concerned about after all.
2007-08-23 03:56:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, I don't understand this either . . . I mean, who is dumb enough to pick a political candidate from an episode of Law and Order?
2007-08-23 03:34:42 · answer #4 · answered by CHARITY G 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋