"Just like communism did terrorism will spread if we just cut and run."
You mean, like hardly at all?
2007-08-23 02:58:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Brian A 7
·
8⤊
0⤋
Goober
grow up
if Iraq had WMD's george W bush would be displaying them like a 12 year old with big tata's
Scott Ritter, an impartial inspector for the U N told Bush & Co before they invaded Iraq that all of those weapons were destroyed.George W Bush himself has admitted that there were NO weapons of Mass Destruction. He claims it was faulty intelligence that led him to believe theydid and convince the Congress and American public of the same.
After reading the faulty documents used to proove his case, most Americans have come to the conclusion that Bush & Co passed on only the info that would convince us to attack, and not the info that prooved there were no WMDs. This was done because Goerge W Bush wanted to be a tuff guy, simply because he felt he had something to proove after bailing on his duties when he had the chance to serve!
We heard from all the experts during Nam how all the countries around Vietnam would fall like dominoes (including Cambodia which IS on Vietnams border) but in reallity, today they have been given favored trade status and have a McDonalds on every corner.
2007-08-23 09:59:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure where you are getting your information, but even President Bush admits there are no WMDs and has also admitted he can't make a case to link Iraq and 9/11.
Iraq is not about terrorism and never has been. It's about President Bush's ego. And the Iraq war has done nothing bu increase terrorist activity as the Bush administration's own reports have stated.
And by the way, opening our mouths and protesting the slaughter of our nations brave military men and women for NO GOOD REASON is not un-American. It's the most American, patriotic thing you can do!
2007-08-23 10:00:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
Your question is wrong on so many levels. Bush is, and has been, doing a horrible job. His approval ratings partially reflect that. It is not “un-American” to criticize a president. No WMDs were found in Iraq. The invasion opened up the country to terrorists. Saddam didn’t let them into to any areas under his control when he was in charge.
We need to leave and let the Iraqis work out their differences. It’s their country and we can’t serve as their police force forever. We are wasting lives and hundreds of billions of dollars.
Based on the naiveté of your statements, your sentence structure and spelling, I suspect that you are quite young. Read more about the war in Iraq, especially the changing rationalizations and the contrasting actual facts.
2007-08-23 09:59:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by tribeca_belle 7
·
8⤊
0⤋
OK, to put it simply... those who criticize the policies of the Bush administration are NOT un-American. This country was founded on principles of freedom from oppressive government and democracy, government by the people and for the people. If we didn't love and care about our country, we'd just sit back and shut up. In case you haven't read it in a while, below is a link you might enjoy.
2007-08-23 10:36:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by sagacious_ness 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
What is antiAmerican about disagreeing with the president.He is only a human being in an elected office.He is nothing supernatural.How many years does it take to find weapons in a country who's arsenal was for the most part dismantled during the first gulf war.Why has it changed from the war in Iraq to the war on terror?We could go on,and on.People tend to believe what they are fed.It is antiAmerican to not question what,and who is giving you the info.
2007-08-23 09:52:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
0⤋
Baby, terrorism has spread under Bush's policies like a grass fire. Look at the facts. Terrorist organization are now more popular, better funded and more effective than before he invaded Iraq. The number of terrorist caused deaths is doubling, tripeling every years.
The facts plainly state that he is doing exactly the WRONG thing to fight terrorism.
Also, it is the patriotic duty of all citizens to hold their leaders responsible and question the leaders actions and policies.
Don't they TEACH you kids this in civics class anymore. The founding fathers has absolutly NO FAITH in leaders, they based the constitution on the fact that we MUST question our leaders constantly.
2007-08-23 09:55:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Fancy That 6
·
9⤊
0⤋
The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
2007-08-23 09:54:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
0⤋
1. Not only liberals think Bush is an idiot. The majority of Americans do.
2. Not sure where you get your info from, but you ought to ask the nurses to loosen your restraints so you can take your meds now. Iraq has/had NOTHING whatsoever to do with terrorism or WMD's. Wake up.
2007-08-23 09:53:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by JeffyB 7
·
12⤊
0⤋
What seems unamerican to a lemming who is unable to think for himself is not necessarily so. Democracy thrives on dissention and difference of opinion. Absolute obedience and agreement with the leader is ripe for totalitarianism. Do you want a dictator? By the attitude you have shown you certainly do.
2007-08-23 10:18:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
You mean the guy holding this nation hostage to a failed administration .
A bunch of self serving criminals who cover up for each other .
When Bush decided that his oath of office meant nothing he ceased being president .
The constitution is anything but a Piece of paper . When George Bush declared he wanted a way around our laws he committed a crime and even though he has not been arrested or tossed out of office does not change that fact .
2007-08-23 09:53:19
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
12⤊
0⤋