Why is terrorism such a higher priority than criminality?

Question

I mean, look at number of deaths and acts of violence from Al Qaeda vs Hells Angles!

It seems that a country's focus on counter terrorism is proportional to the domestic crime rate.

I think there are over 16,000 murders alone in the US pa.

Answer 1

Excerpts from:
The Police State Road Map
March 2005 Edition
Michael Nield
www.policestateplanning.com

The Above mentioned book is quite an informative essay and is Free to download and distribute in PDF form.
It is a bit extreme but sheds much light on the how's and why's in the most criminal act ever committed in history.
The War on Terror.

Here's some of the real criminality going on while the perpetrators are disguising it as a war on terror.

When a government wants to do something unpopular, such as taking all our rights away, it secretly creates a more immediate problem, such as demolishing skyscrapers in Manhattan. To satisfy public demand that no more skyscrapers be demolished in Manhattan, the government... takes all our rights away. The people give thanks to Big Brother for his protection and look back with nostalgia
on their love affair with civil rights. This is 'problem-reaction-solution' where the sponsors of an undesirable measure pose it as a solution to another problem they secretly created.

Here's something many have never considered;

We are told by the ideologists who are advocating the fluoridation of water supplies in this country that their purpose is to reduce the incidence of tooth decay in children . . . the real reason behind fluorination is not to benefit children's teeth. The real purpose behind water fluorination is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty. . . . there is a small area of brain tissue that is responsible for the individual's power to resist domination. Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluorine
will in time gradually reduce the individual's power to resist domination by slowly poisoning and narcotizing this area of brain tissue and make him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. . . . . . . any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or
more will never again be the same person, mentally or physically.'
On 29th June 2000, Dr William J. Hirzy testified before the U.S. Senate Subcommittee on Wildlife, Fisheries and Drinking Water.(135) He represented the labour union of the professional toxicologists, biologists, chemists, engineers and lawyers working at the headquarters of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The union voted to oppose water fluoridation in 1997. These are some of the points Dr Hirzy made to the committee:
- According to a study by the National Institute of Dental Research, 66 percent of American children in fluoridated communities show the visible sign of over-exposure and fluoride toxicity, dental fluorosis.
- In 1998, the results of a fifty-year fluoridation experiment involving Kingston, New York (un-fluoridated) and Newburg, New York (fluoridated) were published. In summary, there is no overall significant difference in rates of dental decay in children in the two cities, but children in the fluoridated city
show significantly higher rates of dental fluorosis than children in the unfluoridated city.
-There is epidemiological evidence showing elevated bone cancer in young men related to consumption of fluoridated drinking water.



Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early
age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible
- Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society

Answer 2

1

Answer 3

We are not discussing the number of deaths but rather who the victims are, what the means was and what the goal is. Now I do not pretend to know how many people have been murdered by any criminal organization but consider this. When Al Capone's goons perpetrated the Valentine's Day Massacre they gunned down seven men.

This was considered an unbelievable number of people killed at one time in a criminal act. Now look at 9/11. Gangs may be fighting over turf or control of some racket but what gang is hellbent on dominating the world?

.

.

Answer 4

Terrorism gets Bush Votes so of course he is going to beat it to death. I believe we need to be careful because the persons entering this country illegally are criminals. Not just because the entered the country illegally but it is the type of personal behavior that the utilize once in the country. Prostitution, Drugs, ID theft and passport duplications are some of the criminal activities the FBI attempts to stop. Still it is difficult because everyone wants to yell that it is politically correct due to politics and Bush. We need to utilize deportation practices for criminals instead of believing its sooo cool to let in illegals who take your ID and what ever else in the name of survival. It is criminal. Some say it is survival. Al Qaeda is just a bunch of brazen persons feeding off the stupidity of Americans. Recruiting as they call it. The come to this country get on welfare and put a electricity bill in their name and their apartment is a haven for about 12-15 persons who all have the same name. We need to start addressing issues instead of thinking its cool to dub the government, We are only screwing ourselves.

Answer 5

Because terrorism generates jobs. Because even when it fails, it still succeeds. Because you can never really stop it entirely but you can spend billions trying. Because you can use it as an excuse to get votes, to take away freedoms, and to explain away almost any action you take regardless of its soundness or legality. Because terrorism does not require a look into right and wrong, it just is terrorism. And finally because criminality requires action, terrorism requires only assumed intent.

Answer 6

When did the Hells' Angels kill over 3000 people and cause billions in damage? Answer: never.
Crimes are handled by police at the local and state level. Terrorism is the responsibility of everyone in government at all levels.

Answer 7

in case you do no longer distinguish unarmed civilians from terrorists and/or enemies then we would not could desire to declare warfare and possibility militia casualties. we would do purely as maximum ignorant human beings recommend and bomb Iraq lower back into the stone age. those ignorant human beings? A civilian expert interior the Bush administration used that factor era to threaten Pakistan if it did no longer co-function with Bush. It became into extensively utilized via USAF Gen. Curtis Lemay in 1965 in the direction of the North Vietnamese attempting to intimidate them to alter their methods interior the warfare. See what the term has executed? i do no longer the two... if it has had any result, it incredibly is been for the extra severe.

Answer 8

SO in other words we should wait until they kill more American on our land then go find the pieces of them and throw them in jail??

We have to stop them BEFORE they attack, not after.

It is like driving down the road, you see an idiot driving like a nut case, you stay away from them you do not get close and personal and if he hits you then you throw him in jail.

Answer 9

When the Hells Angels kill 3,000+ people in one day, let us know.

If the National Guard were sent into your city to make arrests, you'd be whining about your liberties being taken away.

Answer 10

Our priorities have sure shifted. Fear of terrorism is to keep the people in line.