Yawn...this has been asked before. About a hundred times!
2007-08-23 01:09:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Maria 5
·
4⤊
5⤋
A contentious question, but at the very least the McCanns were naive in their care of Madeline.
Its a strange case.
Lets hope something turns up definitely and sheds some light on it
2007-08-23 01:00:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
2⤋
i wouldnt let them look after my plants never mind my precious children, they are a disgrace, if they hadnt been doctors and had been people off a housing estate their other 2 kids would have been removed by social services by now
2007-08-23 03:41:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by emmamac14 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, who on earth would let someone they don't know babysit their children. What is the point of your question
2007-08-23 01:30:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by *Sparki* 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
my children are my life and i wouldn't trust anyone to babysit them...my mam and my sisters are the only ones i use in times of emergencies
2007-08-23 01:16:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I only let people I know babysit for my child, not complete strangers
2007-08-23 01:20:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by claire s 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I don't have children but if I did I certainly would not. Come on they can't look after their own.
2007-08-23 21:39:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. They'd probably go to the pub and leave them on their own.
2007-08-23 01:35:29
·
answer #8
·
answered by dreaming_angel1983 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Could you imagine how much they would want paying to look after them?!
Not got kids but I'm not that crazy.
2007-08-23 01:20:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
They dont understand babysitters. So no. After all the hotel provided a babysitting service that they choose not to use.
2007-08-23 01:01:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by sweetsue_2k03 5
·
8⤊
2⤋
I certainly would not. Can you imagine their patients wanting them to treat them?
2007-08-26 23:57:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋