English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
5

* How was Jamestown portrayed to prospective settlers? What words and image were used to make it appear to be an attractive opportunity?
* Describe the reality of Jamestown in detail.
* Why do you think the English promoted an image of Jamestown that was different from the reality?

2007-08-23 00:45:13 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities History

3 answers

It was the new world, a land of opportunity, riches and freedom. They could own their own land, raise livestock, grow cash crops. It was uncharted territory and many felt gold could be found here.

Reality was it was hot, full of mosquitoes, and very dense with trees, bushes, vines, etc. Indians who didn't want them there. A climate they were not used to and their crops wouldn't grow. Famine and dysentery killed off many.

Like all places they don't want you to know the true reality or very few people would want to go.It is marketing, a concept that is not new. The English government wanted to see what was here and add it to their claim. New lands typically equal new sources of money and business.

2007-08-23 01:00:14 · answer #1 · answered by sig 2 · 3 0

maximum anybody is in lots of circumstances incorrect approximately Jamestown....IT replaced into no longer based by using human beings "escaping" from England. The King of england (James I) despatched them together with his permission. in fact he granted a "patent" to a collection of London entrepreneurs (think of challenge capitalist) and the Virginia business enterprise because it replaced into observed as sailed from London and further 108 adult adult males from throughout England to the hot international. even inspite of the undeniable fact that later arrivals to Jamestown would have had their countless reasons for coming (financial, human rights, political and so on.), the unique founders have been all adult adult males and maximum have been doing it in ordinary terms for earnings. They had to make funds. This replaced into going to be an English colony under administration of the King and that they've been dependable to their King. even inspite of the undeniable fact that it replaced into the 1st everlasting ENGLISH contract contained in the hot international, there have been quite a few previous failed tries (by using England) contained in the late 1580s to 1590s to establish a colony contained in the hot international. Jamestown replaced into based in 1607 by using fact the King of england had to place a declare to the hot international and despatched an day holiday to do it...it replaced right into a commercial challenge designed to advance the King of england. he replaced into finding for gold, a shortcut to the south seas (Asia) and the previous colonists contained in the failed attempt(s) at colonizing the hot international, the "lost" colony of Roanoke. many human beings confuse the Pilgrims/Mayflower colonists with the unique Jamestown colonists. The Pilgrims got here 13 years later (1620) and that they've been people who escaped from England for often religious separatist ideals. The puritans got here some years after that (1628) and the Quakers even later (1657). those are super web pages which will inform you each and everything you could desire to understand....

2016-10-03 02:56:29 · answer #2 · answered by cronican 4 · 0 0

You could ask the same of Jonestown. People flocked there and lost their lives in a tragic mass-suicide.

2007-08-23 01:28:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers