Hillary the Inept Cameleon," who can't seem to change herself fast enough to blend in with the latest opinion polls, will have a real problem when it comes time for her to turn her sights on Joe Biden. She's using up all the brain-power she's got attacking Obama's inexperience. Apparently, even as she stands before the crowd, glowing with conceit, she fails to realtize that, with Obama out of the picture, as she would have it, she will be hoisted on her own battard--after Obama, both she and John Edwards are the least experienced candidates! Hillary is actually making the worst possible argument for her own cause.
The numbers don't lie: Let's list the candidates in the order of their experience in national or gubernatorial public office:
1. Joe Biden (U.S. Senate, 34 years)
2. Chris Dodd (U.S. Senate, 26 years; U.S. Rep., 6 years)
3 Bill Richardson (Governor New Mexico, 3 years; Energy Secretary, 3 years; U.S. Ambass. 1 year; U.S. Rep., 14 years)
2007-08-21
22:17:16
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
4 Mike Gravel (U.S. Senate, 12 years; U.S. Rep., 4 years)
5. Dennis Kucinich (U.S. Rep., 10 years)
6. John Edwards (U.S. Senate, 6 years)
7. Hillary Clinton (U.S. Senate, 6 years)
8. Barack Obama (U,S, Senate, 2 years)
2007-08-21
22:18:54 ·
update #1
You'd have to be dumb as a rock (or named Clinton) to miss this! Hillary attacks Obama for being inexperienced when she's next in line in the roll call of inexperience. If Obama drops out, Hillary and Edwards will be the least experienced. That means that Hillary should drop out of the race because Hillary is against inexperience.
2007-08-21
22:28:32 ·
update #2
Now, she better watch out or that sassy ol' James Carvel will take to calling her "the flippity-flopper"
2007-08-21
22:30:50 ·
update #3