define "me" in the midst of the "we"!?

Answer 1

Some people may argue that the concept of "me" is irrelevant to the prevalent notion of "we"- that is the society. But only "I" can know what I think. I may express what I think to others, confess to them my innermost secrets, do to them things etc. but only "I" know what's going on inside "me". As Nietzche had elegantly put it, we are imprisoned in our own individualism. "They" may form an impression abou "me" in "their" heads but they still wont succeed to invade "me"

Answer 2

A drop in the ocean.


You should try not to define and separate yourself from the rest, because the biggest mistake we make is thinking we are different to everybody else. We are all one consiousness.
And thats the long and short of it!

Answer 3

well literally(and by the word structure)- the letters that separates "me" and "we" are m and w which are but inverted versions of one another. E is exact and extablished...
M could mean being miserly or megalomaniacal..
W could denotes wholeness...
=))))))))))))))))))

so the "me" can definitely divide the "we"
and the "we" can unite the "me"(and many me's)

but alphabetically, "m" comes first before "w"
there wouldnt be "we" without "me"..
and if "me" chooses to be on it's own..
"me" is all but mopes and misery..

Answer 4

"Me" = "We" - "You"