Black Holes VS Super massive black holes?

Question

WHAT is the difference between the 2(and y should anyone care)...I mean seriously brass tacks....they are both singularitites and they both will compress and spin you to the point where you come apart at the subatomic level anyway right?..if not help me to understand...and dont be patronizing...I am human just like you and have decent intelligence like you...so put it out there on the table.

Answer 1

Most of the centers of galaxies contain Super massive black holes, including our galaxy; the Milky Way.

Black holes are huge gravity sucking pits that lead to no where. Super massive black holes should be the same, but they appear to be dormant. What is keeping our super massive black hole at the core of our galaxy form sucking us in? We don't know.

We have known about black holes for a while, but super massive black holes are a recent discovery and they shake our understanding our black holes. Is it possible to fill a black hole up? Can you turn one off and what happens if it turns on again?

All we know is that we haven't been sucked in, we should have been and many galaxies that we see shouldn't be there, they should just be huge black holes. Is this something created by "dark energy" or "dark matter?" We don't know, we aren't sure what dark energy or dark matter is. We just know that most of our universe is missing. We thought it might have been hiding at the bottom of black holes, but we don't think that way anymore. We know there has to be dark energy because there is something that is causing the galaxy to still fly apart.

The big bang happens some 13.7 billion years ago, the universe should be slowing down; it should be expanding at a slower speed. Dark energy is an attempt to explain why this isn't happening. Super massive black holes just add more difficulty to the understanding. We aren't sure how they fit, or even if we have all the pieces of the puzzle.

Answer 2

Well,if a black hole could exist it would have to start off small,not super massive.
It would accrete any matter around it and continue to grow until it became super massive.
Eventually it would eat up all matter and all other black holes and sit for eternity doing nothing.
Not a very noble end for such an amazing entity like a universe.
However there are a few good reasons why black holes are non-viable entities.

Answer 3

History channel? I was wondering the same thing.
You beat me to the question.

I'd say its just a larger, deeper hole with an event horizon thats more "compact" at the bottom with weaker edges that stretch out..............well, its hard for me to explain.

I picture the gravity/space grid picture
http://www.blackfive.net/photos/uncategorized/2007/04/23/20040525gravityprobelg.jpg

the more massive, the deeper it is.
with a regular hole you "hit the bottom" sooner, not giving a chance for the survival of anything

maybe the deeper it is, the more chances of matter compacting into energy exist before it disappers by "hitting the bottom"

Answer 4

Super-massive black holes are thought by many cosmologists to have formed before many galaxies and could have been the nuclei about which galactic formation began.

Your plain ordinary black hole is of virtually no significant importance when compared to that of super-massive black holes.

Answer 5

certainly - a pair of corrections... The get away speed of a black hollow *exceeds* the fee of light. The orbital speed on the form Horizon *is* the fee of light. mild does not have "countless power" - photons exist, shifting precisely as lots power as they have been emitted with. And, as you got here on the brink of a black hollow - stellar-massed or great-great - you're *properly conscious* in the two circumstances of their outcomes....

Answer 6

Size and density go hand and hand .they both effect Space around them only one does it more so than the other....so how do you like clear as mud?