Absolutely, and I am planning on it. ( Independent )
The guy below me: ....wow.....slander or stupidity? He has never said that, implied it, or even come close to suggesting that Bush is responsible for 9/11.
subwlimnuflik - His chances are getting better by the day. The polls that you base your opinion on are not accurate, and history shows that they have little importance. Bill Clinton had a lower poll number than Ron does now, and he won, Dole had similar numbers and he won the nomination, Ronald Reagan had very little support when he announced, and Reagan was speaking the exact same way that Ron Paul is now (only he is the real deal)
2007-08-21 18:44:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
Yes, yes, he's the only one speaking the truth and trying to save this country. Our constitution is being destroyed, and Ron Paul is our only hope to undo all the illegal activities that this president and previous ones have done to us, wake up people. We need to abolish the Fed Reserve and create a sound system..., just do everything constitutional, it's simple, and that's what Ron Pauls about.
2007-08-21 20:40:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by mom4peace 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No because I do not share his values (blaming the poor for being poor, creating an isolationist xenophobic America instead of playing our role as a world leader through endorsing and leading multilateral solutions to global issues), do not trust him due to his inconsistency and hypocricy (saying he supports the constitution but wanting to deport people born in this country: a stunning contradiction to the 14th amendment, and talking about small government while earmarking $400million of pork) and am positively frightened by his ignorance of monetary economics (wanting to return to the gold standard and remove the flexibility from our economy that has prevented extremes like the Great Depression).
I am a Democrat.
2007-08-21 19:54:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sageandscholar 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Assuming he wins the Republican nomination, I would consider it. I think he's one of the two best Republican candidates out there, but I'd have to see which Democrat wins the nomination and how each candidate's stances add up.
For the record, I'm a registered Democrat, but consider myself a Libertarian with a few left leaning ideals. And I pretty much hate every Democratic candidate.
2007-08-21 20:04:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul Revolution!!!
2007-08-21 19:03:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul is ok in my book, but the odds of him being the Republican nominee are only slightly better than aliens landing on the White House lawn.
Do I look like a Democrat?
2007-08-21 18:46:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
What kind of idiot would say that they would not vote for Ron Paul, rated "most conservative" in congress, because they will only vote for a "conservative Republican," and then list liberal Guiliani and flip flopper Romney as their choices. Absolutely retarded. I'd like to see this guys definition of "conservatism." I'm sure it's more like fascism.
2007-08-21 20:06:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by haywood jablome 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
sure i'm going to. he's a strict consitutionalist and could preserve your suitable to undergo hands for the adult adult males who asked the place he's on gun themes. he additionally removes federal taxation and enforce the honest tax software. And to the Idiots at right here who waste their time writing down that he shouldn't win why could you incredibly spend some time merely asserting stuff like "Ron Paul is working for nomination because of the fact the Republicans candidate for president. he will on no account make it because of the fact he does not have the required thousands and thousands of dollars to get the votes. you are able to vote for the guy notwithstanding it will be a organic waste of time." initially your an fool for asserting it incredibly is a waste of time to vote for somebody who's stable. because of the fact the lesser of two evils continues to be evil you idiots. companies are ruining united statesa. and if we merely sit down decrease back like dumb sheep then we are destiny generations will consistently keep in mind how we merely gave up. additionally addressing Ron Paul as being Naiive I strongly disagree. he's greater knowledgeable and intellegent bearing directly to the entire center east subject. you're brainwashed into thinking he's mushy merely because of the fact he does not consider our distant places coverage. he will preserve us with finished tension if we've been in conflict. not a million/2 *** it like President Bush and then postpone on getting out of the area while it's time to bypass. he will declare conflict not in hassle-free terms invade the rustic without thorough theory making plans. besides that he could have the help of the human beings he appoints which I assure are not going to be such clowns like bush has. (all of the present administration is decrease than some variety of criminal examine in case you will be able to desire to not tell) additionally to assert it incredibly is a waste of time to vote or help Ron Paul. Why are you dropping some time to bypass out of your thank you to let us know to not help him. Its not happening...yet thank you for the gas biatches!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He has my vote help and that of my finished family individuals and all my acquaintances.
2016-10-16 10:36:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe. I am very conservative and will vote for the one that I agree with on the issues I feel are most important to me.
2007-08-21 23:29:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by littledel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am a Republican and yes I am. He seems to be the only candidate who has more of an interest in the Constitution and America than his own political career.
2007-08-21 18:58:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋