my team; atlanta falcons.
2007-08-21 12:26:04 · 19 answers · asked by appalacheejames 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
They couldn't win it with Vick.
2007-08-21 12:30:49 · answer #1 · answered by scrb2007 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The falcons need a lot. They need a revamped o-line and a WR that can catch. Joe Horn will help out tremendously he is just on the back end of his career and who knows if he can stay healthy. The falcons also have terrible line backers and could use some help at safety and the d-line. Once they get all those areas straightened out, Joey Harrington can have a chance at winning a Superbowl.
2007-08-21 15:36:13 · answer #2 · answered by Brad 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not anytime soon.
I still think Harrington has talent. He's finally got a coach and an offensive system that he might be able to be efficient in. But, the Falcon have way too many holes to be a contender this year.
However, if Harrington doesn't play well, he's done other than as a backup.
2007-08-21 14:10:03 · answer #3 · answered by bozopolis 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harrington hasn't had a real chance to develop and if any one says the Lions, remember there still the Matt Millen Lions. He played his best in college maybe a college coach can help him regain his form its possible that the falcons win the superbowl without vick, pretty much putting a spike through his heart of leading the falcons to a super bowl championship
2007-08-21 12:32:36 · answer #4 · answered by The Mizz 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
honestly....yes hes better than vick not as flashy but statistacally better, remember joey played on some really bad teams the falcons are a good team they should be able to help joey out more
2007-08-22 05:07:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Harrington hasn't done anything at the Professional Level. I cant see it being any different in Atlanta,
2007-08-21 12:49:32 · answer #6 · answered by SAMHAIN 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I certainly like there chances more with Harrington than Vick. They astonished me by getting to a Super Bowl with Chris Chandler. So, why not?
2007-08-21 12:49:10 · answer #7 · answered by Farthammerjones 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i could ought to assert so. even however Brad Johnson did no longer have an incredible overall performance the two, i think of Ben did worse via a mile. His stats tutor that. 9 passes completions out of 21 tries, 2 interceptions, 123 yards, and 0 TD's. He did no longer throw a single passing TD. a minimum of Johnson had 2 TD's. i think of the regular reason the Steelers won became into via protection, turn overs, and the certainty the Seahawks had maximum of effects. Ben had a unfavorable super bowl, yet they won. So i could ought to assert he's the worst QB to win.
2016-11-13 02:52:15 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry but no.......I feel bad for the Falcons... your team needs to get a better QB........Harrington will be like a band-aid........A weak band-aid.....i really think they should have looked for somebody else......Say Cody Pickett......He would have given your offense some spark......they need to go shopping for a QB next season......Im thinking Colt Brennan would be good for them...
2007-08-21 12:58:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have a good chance of winning the #1 overall pick with him as your starting QB, isn't that better for your franchise to get the #1 pick.
2007-08-21 12:45:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they never had receivers that were expected to catch, just block for Vick scrambling. So give them some time to find W.R.s that can catch and they will do fine
2007-08-21 12:41:40 · answer #11 · answered by Michael G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋