Can Bush attack Iran without congressional action?

Question

I mean, can he do it without violating our constitution.

Answer 1

Yes, for 60 days. Its called the War Powers Act. Gives uss a chance to fight before Congress screws it up.

Answer 2

Yes. According to the war powers act of 1973 the President only has to 'consult' with Congress before 'committing' troops. That could mean two or three of the leadership of each party into a room and telling them about it as the Marines' boots first fall on Iranian soil. The president then has 90 days to get an act of congress approving the action. Basically the president can do what they want for 90 days under the war powers act. However, a president might argue that under article II section 2 of the US constitution that the war powers act is an infringement on the executive's rights and priveledges as commander in chief of the nation's army and navy. I am not suggesting that any of this politically viable or advisable only possible under statutory law and constitution.
semper fi

Answer 3

regardless of if it incredibly is in the form; congress has yet to enforce this power. From the very commencing up, commencing with G. Washington & via the a while, each President has taken this power from congress without lots as a peep from those serving, supposably, the universal public activity. some Presidents have sought approval from congress after the certainty, maximum do not. Neither a Republican nor a Democratic congress has tried to empose this power so each is lacking in accountability to the yank human beings. This power replaced into declared so what has befell in Korea, Vietnam & Iraq could have in hassle-free terms befell had the representitives of the human beings exercised this text because of the fact the genuine voice of the human beings. the human beings have been against all of those wars or Police movements, as Korea replaced into stated as. So, no, it incredibly is not an impeachable offense. Nor could we've been in touch in those conflicts.

Answer 4

Of course Bush can attack Iran without congressional action, depending on circumstances, but in theory congress has to back him for the action to continue.

Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. has repeatedly reminded Canada that “security trumps trade.” Proponents of "deep integration of all 3 nations of NA", that means that unless Canada throws its full support behind President George Bush’s “War on Terror,” the U.S. will shut its border to Canadian goods. Blackmail or what?!?

There's a deep integration agenda with Canada & Mexico being implemented by Bush without ANY debate or input from the public!

The S.P.P. was signed without the backing of Congress or Parliament, and without the general knowledge or acceptance of the democratic public.

Government committees and working groups continue to forge ahead with this big business agenda, and if it continues, the public will only find out about the details after the deals are signed.

THIS IS TREASON.

Closer ties with foreign governments inevitably beg the question of “how close is too close?”

If it means lowering our food safety standards, surrendering civil liberties in the name of “security,” risking our natural resources by signing pacts that will give unfettered access to oil, gas and water reserves, and losing even more economic stability for average citizens with unfair trade agreements ~ then THAT is "too close".

Guess what, boys and girls. They are not just "too close" any more, they are literally living in our skin ~ a skin they are already looking to sell to the highest bidder.

We are living in a post-democratic era. The only votes that matter are the supreme court who regularly over-rule our elected governement.

The North American Competitiveness Council is bad for democracy.

Without public access to the NACC, what guarantee is there that the CEOs won’t sell off our ability to govern for the sake of their own financial gain?

The corporate members of the NACC want the voting public to think that deep integration is a natural evolution of the North American economy. Yet they push for political concessions without a mandate from the people, as a way to speed up the process.

Bush said, “Some have suggested moving water in abandoned pipelines that used to carry energy. That’s a possibility. I would be open to any discussion.” Huh???

Do we want to pool our resources, get rid of our shared border, and link our destiny to other countries?

This goes way beyond free trade. The administration is close to a dictatorship in this secret foreign strategy.

It is "under the radar" pro-business "laws" without democratic processes!!! Not only are voters not asked, but neither is congress! When did we stop believing in "one man, one vote"?!?

Answer 5

Yes he can, while it may be illegal, no one seems able or willing to confront and check him and Cheney. Just look what has been going on around us and you will understand that they are operating as they please irregardless of the law or the constitution and with total disregard for the rule of law and the will of the people.

Answer 6

He could with the war powers act, but by the end of the 60 days he would be looking at an impeachment trial.

Either that or it would be the shortest war in US history.

Answer 7

The President is the only one who reserves the right to wage war in time of threat.

Answer 8

Yes under the War Power Act...Go Bush!

Answer 9

Bush has a team of lawyers who say Bush can do whatever he wants to do.

Answer 10

No.
It would be hard, since Democrats support Iran, and the Terrorists.