It amazes me how fast, and how viciously, we as a people turn on celebrities the moment they are accused of a crime. Yes, we adore celebrities and hold them to a higher standard, but does that justify crucifying them if they do something wrong? In no way am I supporting a person that has broken federal law; I'm merely questioning the morality of excessive and unnecessary media coverage, as well as the fiery and opinionated personal criticism, that these people get by just being famous and committing a crime.
Mike Vick's recent dog-fitting incident, for example, received an all-day special on ESPN, despite lacking additional information that would warrant such coverage. Additionally, there are plenty of opinionated, and shallow, questions on Y!A that seem to attack Mike Vick as a person rather then question the legal aspect of the case:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuvyLcCKWvNuA80amfUrRNHpy6IX?qid=20070821101040AAu11E7
2007-08-21
09:55:52
·
2 answers
·
asked by
pacificislandr4
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Additionally, the story is a goldmine to ESPN from a business stand point, which in itself is a morally questionable, since they're cashing in on a crime story.
I believe we as a people are better than that, we're above gawking and pointing fingers at people that have done something wrong; that we don't gossip and further degrade individuals just because they're celebrities.
2007-08-21
10:03:22 ·
update #1