Yet they still believe what they are being told by Fox News on Global Warming, rather than educating themselves this time.
Is the inability to learn from error a sign of truly limited intelligence?
2007-08-21 09:19:21 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The cons do not learn from m,mistakes.... they just keep on making them, and trying to blame them on someone else.
2007-08-21 09:23:24 · answer #1 · answered by Debra H 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Your hot-button question has proved two important things here:
#1. Insulting another's intelligence will get you nothing but further insults, I'm afraid. Let me just be "un-PC" about it (this is what we want, less PC in the world, right?): a spade may be a spade, but in this case I believe the answer is more complicated than simply a "limited intelligence."
However, I do understand the feeling of frustration and absolute amazement at some individuals steadfast denial of basic and well-known facts.
#2. At least from the folks on this board, it's rather obvious how much credence they give to the authenticity and authority of Fox News.
2007-08-21 15:42:38 · answer #2 · answered by Sangria 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
WMD: Clinton started it.
Saddam 9/11 Link: Did Dan Rather or Saddam personally gave you the words?!
Civil War: see number 2.
Liberals still believe in every Documents that Dan Rather Provided.
Is the inability to learn from error a sign of truly limited intelligence?
2007-08-21 09:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by Samm 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I would dispute each of those assertions. What proof do you possess. Clearly, Iraq has used WMD's even after they were prohibited. Just ask the Kurds. You can pretend they didn't all you want, it just isn't so. Also, our biggest enemy in Iraq is still Al Quaida who took responsibility for 9/11, if the mere fact that they are in Iraq isn't a link, then I don't know what one is. Finally, who ever claimed there wasn't civil war in Iraq? As for global warming... it's the same as the liberal boogey men of the 70's spouting off about the 2nd ice age... I'll believe the affects when I see it. You would be naive to think the support for global warming isn't politically and financially motivated. But, then again... you are pretty naive.
2007-08-21 09:26:47 · answer #4 · answered by Scott B 7 · 0⤊ 4⤋
What's all this about WMD's in Iraq? We have plenty of women doctors right here in America. Why do we need go over to Iraq, to look for women doctors, that President Bush says are buried all over Iraq. I never heard of anything so crazy as burying doctors! I think Bush must be lying.
2007-08-21 09:27:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Got you facts wrong Junior. The Clinton Administration and agreed there were WMD's. Have yet to see proof that Saddam wasn't involved with 9/11 somehow and I can care less about the Iraqi's. And yet you still believe why you are spoon fed by CNN, ABC, NBC and CBS. Your inability to form a coherent thought is astounding
2007-08-21 09:26:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Your questions are running all over the place. There were WMDs in Iraq. You must be deluding yourself.
No conservatives, to my knowledge, tried to make a link between Hussein and 9/11/01.
There is not civil war in Iraq. But that is a claim that left wing liberal loonies have been making anyway.
Now, as for the limited intelligence...a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
2007-08-21 09:26:17 · answer #7 · answered by regerugged 7 · 1⤊ 4⤋
WMD's were a side reason to go into Iraq. We went in because Saddam bragged he had them, and 9-11 showed us we could not wait until he gets them.
Bush never stated Saddam was behind 9-11
You are wrong on civil war in Iraq. It is Iran and Syria trying to destabilize.
Man caused global warming is not true. The Earth goes through natural ups and downs.
Thanks for the insults. Those who cannot win on merits call names.
2007-08-21 09:51:49 · answer #8 · answered by Chainsaw 6 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Depleted Wmd,s does not count cons. Your dumbass Reagan gave them the chem-bio weapons in the 80,s Quit trying to cover up that factoid!
2007-08-21 09:35:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Wrong on WMD's??? Someone should hav told my son who was one of the soldiers that uncovered cashes of Chemical and Biological WMD's, some still on warheads. THe link to 911 was not a direct one as you try to indicate but one on indirect having terrorist training camps in Iraq...Proven! Civil war in Iraq? Jumping the gun and on the band wagon again I see! Go figure!
2007-08-21 09:24:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
We all know that they were wrong, done, we're trying to get out of there now....remember? That's old news and them just trying to convince themselves and pull in a sucker a day to believe it too........I avoid watching FOX now. Talk about propaganda, I thought we were incapable of that but yet we have fined tuned it to the best of all countries.
2007-08-21 09:23:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋