It's obviously cheaper to pevent diseases than to treat catastrophic terminal illnesses.
2007-08-21 09:03:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I'm against it because I've taken charge of my own diet and have prevented all the health problems the doctors were useless in treating.
Let's see, I was sick - I threw a bunch of money at doctors and drugs that did nothing for me - I took charge of my own health, radically changed my diet, and I'm healthy now.
Yet you have a plan for me to start giving my money back to those doctors and drug companies, through the corrupt government no less? Yeesh, give me a break! I have my own problems to deal with.
2007-08-21 09:08:39 · answer #1 · answered by freedom first 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
1
2016-05-18 23:40:50 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2
2016-09-18 13:31:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm a 45 year old woman and was recently diagnosed as being a borderline diabetic. My doctor prescribed some medication, but before filling it I decided to do some research on the internet which led me to the methods. After reading this ebook and applying the methods, my scepticism turned to 100% belief. I noticed that my energy levels increased significantly and I felt more rested in the morning, my symptoms started going away.
I am very happy to tell you that I have been feeling better than I have felt in years and my doctor informed me that he will be taking me off my prescriptions if I keep this up.
I recommend you use the Type 2 Diabetes Destroyer to naturally reverse your diabetes.
2016-05-20 07:53:24 · answer #4 · answered by Joanna 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure it's cheaper which is why I pay for my own health care like every good citizen should do.
We react again'st National Health Care because it is a financial boondoggle. Look at the waiting times and lack of high tech equipment in Canada and the UK, why on earth would I want a failed national health care program like that ?
There is no right to health care let alone Taxpayer provided health care in this country and thats the way it should be. If you're not an American and apparently your not why is your opinion to be considered relevant on this subject ?
2007-08-21 09:11:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well I'm not an "obese diabetic glutton" but it sure would make me feel a little bit better if I had some sort of health insurance just in case.
2007-08-21 09:12:00 · answer #6 · answered by Vanilla Face 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You forget a fundamental issue here. People are free to do whatever they want. We have to pay for smokers too, you don't mention that.
Or alocoholics?
Humanbeings are HUMAN and the goverment has no right to tell us what to do with our bodies. But if they really gave a ****, they would stop subsidising corn for the manufacturing of corn syrup and sending our schools foods that are also subsidised and terrible for our children.
Have you seen school lunches? We can't control what people do in their own homes, but we can certainly influence their choices, such as restricting food stamps to only healthy choices, taking vending machines out of schools and charging more for healthcare for people who are considered obese.
And the Government doesn't really seem very interested in dealing with all the toxins in our environment from cleanrers, pesticides, etc. which is showing that one chemical on it's own isn't so harmful, but all of them together? Cancer?
My God, it's not just fat people who **** up their bodies and you have no right to deny anyone care because of their own stupidity, that's the point of being part of a SOCIETY.
2007-08-21 09:16:37 · answer #7 · answered by Ellinorianne 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
People who live in countries who have national health care systems experience longer wait times for health care and generally less quality of care. Why? Because the goverment is a slow moving machine full of bureaucrats who waste peoples time and money. Why give away whats left of American freedom by letting the goverment control yet another aspect of your life.
2007-08-21 09:14:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
In a truly free society people are free to make their own choices, good or bad. Justify a national health care system that forces you to make only good choices. Unless you want to claim that we are the property of the state then I don't see how you can justify it.
2007-08-21 09:10:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
no it's because I don't want to give 70 percent of my income to a system that schedules and appoint for 6 or 8 months later! Unlike the uk and other countries, I see a doctor the day I for to their office with no government RED TAPE and I don't get a run around I don't care attitude.
2007-08-21 09:14:00 · answer #10 · answered by Jan Luv 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋