English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Not who you want to win necessarily but who do you honestly think will win. Pick the candidate not just the party. Thanks

2007-08-21 08:54:21 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

17 answers

Hillary. She's ahead, she has the money, and Obama's lack of international experience will take him out. The Republicans are unelectable unless the nominee distances himself from the poor management of the Bush administration -- and the party won't nominate somebody who does that. Giuliani would probably win if nominated but the GOP won't nominate him.

They all seem unelectable: A woman, a Black, a short attorney, a Mormon, a social liberal Republican, and the typical flock of far right conservatives. Of that, Americans will decide femininity is the easiest to accept. Its either Hillary or somebody not in yet, such as Newt Gingrich.

2007-08-21 09:10:55 · answer #1 · answered by Baccheus 7 · 0 2

Hillary Clinton, barring any unforseen candidates from jumping in the race *cough* Gore *cough*.

Hillary may very well get the nomination and whoever the Dems nominate will win in 08 because the momentum, the money, the enthusiasm and the environment are all favoring a Democrat, much like 2006 did. It will take much for a Republican to overcome. Not impossible, but improbable.

2007-08-21 16:24:40 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas G 2 · 1 2

I would "bet" my life on nothing!!!!!!!!

I do not know who will win, But I believe, Corperations rule!
and they are heavy invested in Hillary, she's already bought and paid for, I think her nomination is a shoo in, it has been planned for many years.Clintons are a partnership, not a marriage. I hope I am wrong!!! But I have thought this a long time via various books I have read. Fred Thompson maybe on the other side just because he has been out of the arena.

Still it is much too too early, and who knows live today die
tommorrow!!!!! I do not pay attenion to polls, think they are off
kilter, Not enough people asked through out the states.

2007-08-21 16:13:46 · answer #3 · answered by jenny 7 · 0 2

Assuming we have an election, I would bet my life that the candidate who kisses the most corporate *** will be the one that wins. Right now, I would bet on Hillary C. If for no other reason than the fact that then we will be saddled with at least twenty four years with no President named anything other than Clinton or Bush.

PS; I like Edwards, but loose lips...

2007-08-21 16:03:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

WARNING: The following contains high degrees of rhetoric, which has been known to cause foaming of the mouth among the highly opinionated (remember: intelligence is inversely proportional to the amount of vitriol one may espouse). ;)

===========

I do not believe that any of the current candidates have either the political clout or statesmanship to stand out as a leader for this battered country of ours, much less among a world that so badly needs someone to take a true leadership role.

Unquestionably, the most experience has to go with Hillary Clinton (you don't have to like her, her politics, or the Democratic party; but you must admit that it's true; if not, then you seriously need to examine all the candidates' credentials).

However, as we have seen in the last two Presidential elections, the intelligence of the masses matches that of its elected officials, so I don't have much hope for any future candidate, much less for its people.

======

Thus endeth the rant! ;)

2007-08-21 16:37:57 · answer #5 · answered by skaizun 6 · 0 3

Out of all those faces in view, Edwards looks like the typical American political image. McCain is next. If Romney wasn't a mormon, he would appear at the top of the list but then again, we did have a Quaker in the white house-Nixon.

2007-08-21 16:06:13 · answer #6 · answered by anaise 6 · 0 2

I am for Mike Huckabee, but I think it will be Gulliani or Fred Thompson if he gets in.
I truly don’t see any of the dems turning any red States blue with their far left socialist views.

No mater how much Hillary is trying to remake herself into a centrist, she will never shed her Marxist past.

The correct winner, regardless of party, should be a former Governor. They have the experience needed for the job.

2007-08-21 16:08:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Edwards

I dont think America is ready to accept a female or a black president yet. And all that can be confirmed with all the "Hitlary" "Hilary is gay" and all the "Ob/sama" and Osama is a muslim talk that I hear somewhat frequently on YA! and other con blog/forums

Too bad Kucinich doesn't have a chance.

2007-08-21 15:59:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

unfortunately, I would say anyone but Hillary or Obama and this is what narrow minded people think of in this country.

If you're asking for a name, I'd say Rudy Guiliani.

I've lived in New York all my life and I don't care what his idiot kids do to get back at daddy for divorcing their mother, the man can lead. he cleaned up NYC and led us out of the worst event in American history.

2007-08-21 16:05:28 · answer #9 · answered by CGAA72 3 · 1 2

Ron Paul. If he doesn't win we will surely lose all our freedoms and life as a slave will not be worth living.

2007-08-21 17:56:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers