Hilary Clinton, would even consider her for president if it weren't for her old man??

Question

Look, In my views Bill Clinton was weak on terrorism 96 Khobar Towers 19 Airman dead, 300 wounded, U.S. Embassy bombings 5,000 Wounded in 98, U.S.S. Cole, 9-11 took 6 to 8 years to plan,

Scandals, Whitewater, prejury, law licesne ripped away by the courts, Pardoned Cronies from Whitewater and who ever paid him, Charged his friends to sleep in the lincoln bedroom, Monica, Gen Flowers, the list goes on,

I didn't hate Clinton he was my president but I disagreed with him on his polices and his morality.

Now, I ask you do you want more of that back in the white house and WOULD YOU CONSIDER HER FOR PRESIDENT if her last name wasn't Clinton??? Do you feel her in office your electing Bill???

Answer 1

I wouldn't vote for her, and I wouldn't want her in office. You know how they say the more you are around someone the more you become like them? They are a matched set, and I don't want to experience that again. Once is enough.

Answer 2

Bill was the most investigated President ever. I believe if you investigated our current President or others for nearly 8 years, you could find as much, or more to disagree with. The opposition party wanting to discredit a popular President. At some point, now 7 years later, people are going to have to let it go and focus on the here and now.

Because of Bill Clinton's popularity and name recognition, she has a lot of recognition. But did our current President not use name recognition to get elected as well?

Terrorism is an ongoing issue. It didn't start with Bill Clinton and it won't end with George Bush. It's easy with hindsight to second-guess how issues were handled. They thought they were doing the best they could with what they knew at the time. I don't think the distraction of an Impeachment did anything to get us focused on real issues.

Hilary is her own person and I hope that those who vote for, or against, her are doing it based on her policies and what is best for this country rather than because she is the spouse of a popular former President. Certainly, the experience that he has gained with 8 years in this office would be a resource for her to draw from that other candidates would not have.

Answer 3

Clinton is a Socialist, she even admits it by ability of bearing on herself as a favorite like those of the early and mid twentieth centry. So, in case you're a socialist, which maximum Brits are than you may think of she could be greater effective than Bush. yet look at what socialism has accomplished to that when great u . s .. If Clinton have been to be elected than the rustic will take a lots closer step to starting to be a pathetic shell of it incredibly is self.

Answer 4

Do you know how many senior citizens lost their life savings in Whitewater? Either Hillary didn't even know her husband was having affair after affair. In which case, How can she be expected to know what's happening around the world and all over the United states. Or, She knew about them and tried to defend him when Monica scandal started. In which case she is the sleaziest bucket of trash on the political radar.

How come, Not a single reporter has asked her a question like that?

Answer 5

No. While her association with Bill Clinton certainly doesn't help her, she's been a political figure in her own right ever since he was elected. She's had her own agenda and has demonstrated that she is an uber-socialist and gross political opportunist. She was then, she is now. Her social programs will cost the nation trillions and me, personally, thousands. She would expand the dependent class in this country and expect me to help pay for it. THAT is why I wouldn't consider her for President. I have enough dependents, thank you. I don't need several million more.

Answer 6

I would not consider Hillary because she is a socialist. It has nothing to do with her name nor the fact that she is Mrs Bill Clinton.
It is her politics with which I disagree.
In short, I don't like communism therefore Hillary will not get my vote.

Answer 7

Why would you consider Bush for President in 2004 after 3000 people were killed in the largest attack in American history after he received a memo just a month earlier titled "Bin Laden determined to strike the U.S."

Try to learn something. You're embarrassing yourself.

Answer 8

I do not consider her for president no matter WHAT her name is. My vote in the primary will be for the person most likely to beat her and in the general election this registered Dem will vote for the Repub if Rottenham Clinton is in the race.

Answer 9

You forgot that we that hard working Americans paid more in taxes during the Clintoon debacle. Of course I wouldn't vote for her. I find it hard to believe that the dems can't find a better candidate this time around. Kerry was bad enough but he had much higher approval rating than Hillary.

Answer 10

If he could run again I would vote for him. His mistakes are nothing compared to other Presidents. His wife however, I probably won't vote for. Depends on the evil that the Republicans end up with. I might just have to go with Hillary.