Did anyone watch that 9/11 conspiracy hit piece last night on the History Channel?

Question

I didn't get to watch it. Did it address all the real unanswered questions of 9/11 like why did the FBI secretly released about 100 Israeli spies caught in a dragnet right after 9/11 without being questioned?

Or why the BBC and CNN reported that WTC 7 fell when it was still standing?

I was curious to know what you thought of the documentary whether you think 9/11 was an inside job or not.

Israeli Spy ring as reported by FAUX

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6110095161238848541&q=israeli+spies+9%2F11&total=84&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=1

BBC reported WTC 7 fell when it was sitll standing

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5661808404862296083

Answer 1

The Hit piece used their "experts" Popular Mechanics, owned by Hearst Publishing, which also owns The History Channel, conflict of interest? yes and a shabby stab at yellow journalism by the History channel. This program was a joke, Regardless of what you believe. Lets see what they just happened to leave out

According to 9/11 researcher James Gourley, the debunkers attempted to wriggle out of Secretary Norman Mineta's bombshell testimony about Cheney's actions in the Emergency Operations Center, by claiming that Mineta was talking about Flight 93 and not the plane that hit the Pentagon. In reality, Mineta makes it clear in his testimony that he is talking about Flight 77, "the airplane coming in to the Pentagon," and this is then confirmed by Commissioner Lee Hamilton.

The debunkers admitted that temperatures inside the twin towers were not hot enough to melt steel, but claimed that they were hot enough to weaken steel and cause the collapse. The debunkers uniformly failed to address the fact that firefighters and first responders described witnessing molten steel beneath the rubble of the towers and they also ignored Professor Steven Jones' scientific analysis of the iron-rich microspheres found in the rubble. In a website posting last night, Professor Jones stated that he emphatically pushed the dust analysis during his interview with the producers, but the topic was completely overlooked. The New York Times reported that the molten steel was "perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered" but the History Channel, mirroring NIST, failed to address the issue.

The debunkers mentioned WTC 7 only in passing and completely failed to address why the building, which wasn't hit by a plane, collapsed in 7 seconds into its own footprint after suffering only limited fire damage from falling debris. They also failed to mention why news outlets were reporting the collapse of Building 7 over an hour before it actually fell.

The wargames that dovetailed 9/11 and deliberately confused NORAD personnel so as to slow response to the real attack were completely excluded.

- The Able Danger program and how the hijackers were discovered before 9/11 was completely excluded.

- The fact that the money man behind the hijackers, Pakistan’s ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad, was meeting with U.S. government and intelligence officials before and on the morning of 9/11, was completely excluded.

- William Rodriguez' first-hand testimony of explosions prior to the impact of the planes was completely excluded, as was the testimony of numerous firefighters who attested to bombs and explosions.

- NBC reporter Pat Dawson claimed that FDNY Chief of Safety Albert Turi had only described explosions, not bombs, going off, contradicting Dawson's own report at the time which stated, "Reports of a secondary device, that is another ‘bomb’ going off."

Hearst Publishing's Popular Mechanics, the premiere name in yellow journalism, were featured on the show as the most prominent debunkers, shilling for their corporate bosses in a brazen display of cronyism.

The History Channel is part of the A&E Television Network which is jointly owned by The Walt Disney Company (37.5%), The Hearst Corporation (37.5%), and NBC Universal (25%).

The owners of Popular Mechanics are also the joint owners of the History Channel!

I for one will never see the History Channel as a source of any historical facts as they cannot be trusted

Answer 2

History Channel 9 11 Conspiracy

Answer 3

Rupert Murdoch owns Fox News - interestingly he also owns The History Channel.

It was a hit piece alright! Well manufactured to try to debunk all the 9/11 conspiracy theories - much like the Popular Mechanic article with John McCain

Here is a list of the Channels Murdoch owns - And as you can tell he is the largest media player on the Globalist strategy stage.

Nothing he produces or manufactures is of any truth - just more propaganda and disinformation to further distance us from the truth.

So - no, we will never have a 9/11 piece that isn't biast or propaganda unless PBS does something on it

News Corporation - a part of Murdoch's Media Trail
The List

New York Post
Twentieth Century Fox
Fox Filmed Entertainment
Fox 2000
Fox Searchlight
Fox Family Films
Fox Animation Studios
Twentieth Century Fox Home
History Channel
National Geographic Channel
Twentieth Century Fox T.V.
Fox Broadcasting Company
Fox Entertainment
Fox Kid's Network
Fox Sports
Speedvision
Fox News Channel
The Comedy Channel (80%) He almost owns the comedy channel - bye bye Daily Show

As a matter a fact there is a conspriacy with the OK bombing. Tim McVeigh was approached by mysterious agents and given the schematics and the info needed to get the job done. Didn't you ever read about the link with the Ryder truck. Israel is always involved.

Answer 4

This was a very Bias History Channel and Unpopular Mechanics presentation

I also watched that show just now on the history channel, which was said to be unbiased presenting both sides but all they did is make the "conspiracy" people (the people that are asking questions and raising points that go against the "official story") look EVIL and WRONG and that they DON'T RESPECT THE LOSS OF LIVES ON THAT DAY. WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS!

My 1st link below is to the article which explains how the history channel is back-pedaling from it's description (but not changing the bias).

They left out MANY of good points that are in Loose Change as well as Zeitgeist. They also presented everything with a CONSPIRACY Response: followed by EXPERT'S Response..... With the footage they used basically it made it seem like: Here's what the WRONG people say, Here's what the RIGHT people say....

What they should've done, is established an unbiased Side A proposal then a Side B proposal.

They didn't say anything about the sub-level explosions that went on in the basements of the trade center towers. They try to explain that FALLING DEBRI from the trade center towers FLEW across the way and hit trade center 7 starting fires! They also claimed that Silverstein (the owner of the trade center buildings) said that he decided to "pull it" and by that meaning pull out the people and firefighters (who says pull it? maybe evacuate? get everyone out?.... demolitionists say pull it is a well used phrase for initiating a demolition).

(3rd link below is the Loose Change video which raises many questions behind 9/11)

They didn't reveal ANYTHING about the smell of Thermite (used in explosives) at ground zero, NOR did they say anything about the perfect straight cuts in the steal beams of the building (which demolitionists explain is exactly how you take down a building, by cutting it diagonally). My 2nd link below shows a picture of exactly what I'm talking about.

AND THEY DIDN'T SAY A SINGLE THING ABOUT THE VIDEOS TAKEN BY CAMERAS AT THE GAS-STATION / HOTEL ACROSS THE HIGHWAY LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PENTAGON: WHICH WERE TAKEN AWAY BY GOVERNMENT SECRET SERVICE AGENTS! (which display much more than 1 frame per second which was what the government did release)

The history channel's show 9/11 conspiracy theories was originally debunking 9/11 myths.

They also try to associate Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theorists" with people that don't care about the lives lost on that day. They bring up some lady saying that says "Whenever people bring up these conspiracies... it's like a knife being stabbed into my heart because they have no concern for the people that lost someone that day, or those that died" WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS. They do believe those people died, they do mourn their deaths, BUT they do not believe that it happened the way that we are being told!

Bottom line, they keep associating Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theory" believers with not caring about the people that died, or the people that lost someone....

Basically, they do reveal a lot of information but in the end, they try to say that all of the evidence brought to the attention by Loose Change, Webster Tarpley, and many many other professors and demolitionists is wrong, which it isn't.

This is just the most recent and official version of government propaganda trying to say that the "official story"(original claim of how/why 9/11 happened) is correct.

Edit:

Also see 4th link about the molten steel / thermite!

http://www.infowars.net/articles/august2007/030807HistoryChannel.htm

http://chainsawsanders.com/howtocutasteelbeam.jpg

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&total=2635&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

http://www.911weknow.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=24&Itemid=49

Also note:

like how the history channel kept showing the Pentagon collapse photos of the damaged area that did not collapse till 30 minutes later. They showed no photos of the initial 15 to 17 feet wide hole caused by the crash.
http://911lies.org/911_pentagon_attack_damage.jpg

Nor did they show the correct flight pattern of the airplane:
http://911lies.org/images2/fligh_path_pentagon_911.jpg

In the above link you will see:
The pilot passed up a clear direct frontal assault on his target.

He then passed through the air space of Reagan International. During this maneuver they dropped 7000 feet and by all reports did it like an ace fighter pilot.

Amazingly, the pilot managed maneuver the 757, through obstacles, attaining a flight level of 20 feet , in distance of about 1/4 mile, in order to strike the only wall of the entire Pentagon to be reinforced to withstand such an attack.


Popular Mechanics was pretty good at saying things were not true, just because they weren't true.

Anyone that has researched 9/11 and the events would easily see how corporate tried to skew the view.

Answer 5

...I think we should accept the fact that we hav a problem "within"...and it is not a conspiracy that anyone can conclusively understand at this time...so,we should put aside the theories surrounding 911...as we all know the enemies are potentially in every corner of the world including in our own back and front yard...so,let's focus on improvement of our way of life...and we can start with something real like subsidizing the auto industry here by converting to all electric cars(We hav the technology)...with the 10's of billions of our tax dollars our fed Govt. donates around the world.Thus creating more jobs and improving our health with the air we breathe while sharing our wealth between U.S. here at home...it's better than having a blind eye toward our own people which the current administration seems to practice a little too much as we hav all witnessed these past 7 years.

Answer 6

I didn't see the entire program but I saw most of it. For the most part, the conspiracies were discounted. There are several unanswered questions, but with an event that big, with that many people involved, we're going to get all kinds of theories on why and how this happened.

Answer 7

It was the mother of all hit pieces. Go to www.prisonplanet.com to see why - too much for me to list, but it was full of bias and straw man arguments. Yes! I know that 9/11 was an inside job.

Answer 8

I saw some of it.. did not remember it was on.

As to what it addressed.. well.. some of it sounded a bit unlikely but man.. some sure sounded like it could have happened.

I do not know if there was a conspiracy like that.. but there was something more than what we were told. I would put money on it.

Answer 9

no, I can't say I did, but nothing reaches mainstream media which would cast doubt on the Official Account. The mainstream media are major accomplices in the psy-op itself and have been unrelentingly ever since.

Answer 10

I saw it. It thoroughly debunked all the conspiracy theories, just as anyone who took high school physics could. I never needed a History Channel Special to tell me what my education in physics and engineering already told me. I haven't heard this new myth about the imaginary spies or psychic news but I guess you guys just create new realities every time your going conspiracy theories are shot down. It was not an inside job.