No WMD's = Bush Lies?

Question

Funny how everyone that screams 'but... but... clinton thought saddam had WMD's too' and 'but.. but.. democrats voted to allow dubya to invade iraq' seem to forget that clinton never invaded iraq, and that the democrats who voted to allow dubya to invade iraq were duped?

The fact is - Dubya was wrong. And so was anyone else who overstated saddams weapons programs.

Now nearly 4000 american soldiers are dead, tens of thousands are injured, hundreds of thousands of iraqis are dead, injured, and displaced, and we've spent nearly 1/2 trillion dollars.

For what?

'but... but.. we got rid of saddam hussein'

the one guy who was able to maintain a secular government in iraq... f'ing brilliant...

Ahh...exactly the responses I wanted.

Thanks morons!!

P.S. - I'm not a liberal, but feel free to call me one if it makes you feel better!

(The 'D' stands for Dubya)

Interesting reasoning Brian.

Unfortunately his 'lies that he didn't know were lies' were still lies.

Answer 1

No, No WMDs <> Bush lies. If one is incorrect but believes what one says that is not a lie.

Answer 2

Bush should be ambushed for the invasion of Iraq and the killing of all the innocent people there. These people of Iraq had a better live under Saddam. Bush is the number One terriorist in the world. He must be tried for war crime and punished. The 911 attack could have been an inside job orgained by bush to invade Iraq for OIL. Weapons of mass destruction was a whole lot of crap.

Answer 3

yes. Bush's full of them.
AFTER Sept 11, 2001 Bush:

-- Allowed relatives (and their entourages) of Osama bin Laden, the man who admitted responsibility for the attacks on Sept 11, to leave the country when everyone in the US was not allowed to fly ANY type of aircraft in US airspace. The bin Ladens were removed from the US without being debriefed about Osama Bin Laden by the FBI;
-- Spoke out against the formation of an independent 9/11 Commission, resisted handing over required paperwork to that Commission, and even refused to testify to the Commission under oath.
-- Despite Bush's repeated promises to "get" bin Laden "dead or alive", and to "smoke" bin Laden "out of his hole", Osama bin Laden, the mastermind behind two successful attacks on the WTC, an attack on the Pentagon, an attack on a US Navy Destroyer, the USS Cole, and several embassy bombings around the globe, remains free and at large. The latest intel surmises bin Laden to have rejoined his family in Saudi Arabia, apparently free of fear of being extradited to the US by our Saudi 'allies'.
-- Strongly resisted the formation of the Dept of Homeland Security (actually, I totally agreed with him denouncing this additonal bureaucracy);
-- Quietly suspended the constitutional doctrine of HABEAS CORPUS under the guise of fighting the "war on terror";
-- Taken a surplus in the federal budget and turned it into an almost 9 Trillion dollar deficit, all that money spent and the Us is no more secure now than it was before Sept 11 2001

Answer 4

Excellent question. Don't expect to change the minds of any Bush supporters, though. They'll be defending the Bush White House for the rest of their lives, Good Germans that they are...

Answer 5

As you can see by many of the nasty replies you have received. Some just refuse to face the facts. It's unfortunate that they have bought into the fear driven mindset

Answer 6

a star worthy question if there ever were one.

i apologize for all of the neocon barbarians out there that will only criticize and berate you for asking a fine question because they are unable to disagree with you via any credible argument

Bush lied. period.

Answer 7

You seemed to have answered your questions. Are you asking something from the rest of us?

Answer 8

What do you think Saddam killed all those Kurds with? A little bowel gas after eating a bowel of camel stew?

Answer 9

Walk it off Mary, Saddam had to go, Now take that yellow belly and go away, okay.

Answer 10

George....does the D in your ID stand for dumbazz?