Did any conspiracy theorists watch the History Channel last night?

Question

All your theories were shot down, like a duck sitting on a tree limb, by experts in every field.
The show was called:
9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction
Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.

TVPG

Are you out for the truth, or is it any story goes, as long as you hurt the Bush Adminsration?


http://www.history.com/schedule.do?action=daily&date=20070820&time=2100&timeZone=PST&x=13&y=

Again, it appears that some of the theorists, some of them having answered this Q, don't care what the truth is. They care to bring down the Bush Administration using LIES to deceive others. Shame, that.
Theorists of 9/11, it seems, will believe ANYTHING, even when they're slapped in the face with reality, and even as the terrorists laugh at them. Which will be forever as long as they continue to live in denial of the truth.

Answer 1

HELL YEAH. That was awesome. I really loved the parts where the firefighters that were THERE on 9/11 were tearing into the conspiracy nuts. That and when the Victims were talking about how it is such a disgrace. Even Dylan Avery kept saying how his "loose change" video is being debunked, one part at a time, starting with the cellphone calls from the air and "controlled demolition" bullshiit.
Overall, Conspiracy theorists PWNT.

But knowing conspiracy theorists, they will argue that now the History channel is part of some government conspiracy.

Answer 2

Rupert Murdoch owns Fox News - interestingly he also owns The History Channel. It was a hit piece alright! Well manufactured to try to debunk all the 9/11 conspiracy theories - much like the Popular Mechanic article with John McCain Here is a list of the Channels Murdoch owns - And as you can tell he is the largest media player on the Globalist strategy stage. Nothing he produces or manufactures is of any truth - just more propaganda and disinformation to further distance us from the truth. So - no, we will never have a 9/11 piece that isn't biast or propaganda unless PBS does something on it News Corporation - a part of Murdoch's Media Trail The List New York Post Twentieth Century Fox Fox Filmed Entertainment Fox 2000 Fox Searchlight Fox Family Films Fox Animation Studios Twentieth Century Fox Home History Channel National Geographic Channel Twentieth Century Fox T.V. Fox Broadcasting Company Fox Entertainment Fox Kid's Network Fox Sports Speedvision Fox News Channel The Comedy Channel (80%) He almost owns the comedy channel - bye bye Daily Show As a matter a fact there is a conspriacy with the OK bombing. Tim McVeigh was approached by mysterious agents and given the schematics and the info needed to get the job done. Didn't you ever read about the link with the Ryder truck. Israel is always involved.

Answer 3

I also watched that show just now on the history channel, which was said to be unbiased presenting both sides but all they did is make the "conspiracy" people (the people that are asking questions and raising points that go against the "official story") look EVIL and WRONG and that they DON'T RESPECT THE LOSS OF LIVES ON THAT DAY. WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS!

My 1st link below is to the article which explains how the history channel is back-pedaling from it's description (but not changing the bias).

They left out MANY of good points that are in Loose Change as well as Zeitgeist. They also presented everything with a CONSPIRACY Response: followed by EXPERT'S Response..... With the footage they used basically it made it seem like: Here's what the WRONG people say, Here's what the RIGHT people say....

What they should've done, is established an unbiased Side A proposal then a Side B proposal.

They didn't say anything about the sub-level explosions that went on in the basements of the trade center towers. They try to explain that FALLING DEBRI from the trade center towers FLEW across the way and hit trade center 7 starting fires! They also claimed that Silverstein (the owner of the trade center buildings) said that he decided to "pull it" and by that meaning pull out the people and firefighters (who says pull it? maybe evacuate? get everyone out?.... demolitionists say pull it is a well used phrase for initiating a demolition).

(3rd link below is the Loose Change video which raises many questions behind 9/11)

They didn't reveal ANYTHING about the smell of Thermite (used in explosives) at ground zero, NOR did they say anything about the perfect straight cuts in the steal beams of the building (which demolitionists explain is exactly how you take down a building, by cutting it diagonally). My 2nd link below shows a picture of exactly what I'm talking about.

AND THEY DIDN'T SAY A SINGLE THING ABOUT THE VIDEOS TAKEN BY CAMERAS AT THE GAS-STATION / HOTEL ACROSS THE HIGHWAY LOOKING DIRECTLY AT THE SIDE THAT WAS HIT BY THE PENTAGON: WHICH WERE TAKEN AWAY BY GOVERNMENT SECRET SERVICE AGENTS! (which display much more than 1 frame per second which was what the government did release)

The history channel's show 9/11 conspiracy theories was originally debunking 9/11 myths.

They also try to associate Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theorists" with people that don't care about the lives lost on that day. They bring up some lady saying that says "Whenever people bring up these conspiracies... it's like a knife being stabbed into my heart because they have no concern for the people that lost someone that day, or those that died" WHICH IS TOTALLY BOGUS. They do believe those people died, they do mourn their deaths, BUT they do not believe that it happened the way that we are being told!

Bottom line, they keep associating Loose Change believers and "conspiracy theory" believers with not caring about the people that died, or the people that lost someone....

Basically, they do reveal a lot of information but in the end, they try to say that all of the evidence brought to the attention by Loose Change, Webster Tarpley, and many many other professors and demolitionists is wrong, which it isn't.

This is just the most recent and official version of government propaganda trying to say that the "official story"(original claim of how/why 9/11 happened) is correct.

Edit:

Also see 4th link about the molten steel / thermite!

http://www.infowars.net/articles/august2007/030807HistoryChannel.htm

http://chainsawsanders.com/howtocutasteelbeam.jpg

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&total=2635&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0

http://www.911weknow.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=24&Itemid=49

Also note:

like how the history channel kept showing the Pentagon collapse photos of the damaged area that did not collapse till 30 minutes later. They showed no photos of the initial 15 to 17 feet wide hole caused by the crash.
http://911lies.org/911_pentagon_attack_damage.jpg

Nor did they show the correct flight pattern of the airplane:
http://911lies.org/images2/fligh_path_pentagon_911.jpg

In the above link you will see:
The pilot passed up a clear direct frontal assault on his target.

He then passed through the air space of Reagan International. During this maneuver they dropped 7000 feet and by all reports did it like an ace fighter pilot.

Amazingly, the pilot managed maneuver the 757, through obstacles, attaining a flight level of 20 feet , in distance of about 1/4 mile, in order to strike the only wall of the entire Pentagon to be reinforced to withstand such an attack.


Popular Mechanics was pretty good at saying things were not true, just because they weren't true.

Anyone that has researched 9/11 and the events would easily see how corporate tried to skew the view.

Answer 4

I usually love the History Channel, but was throughly disappointed.

Watched it...and, being a skeptic, I thought the whole thing was biased. Furthermore, they left out a whole bunch of theories. They picked the ones that they thought they could debunk (but even on those they left some things out). There were several that I personally think there may be some fact in, but left them out.

Furthermore, most of the "experts" they interviewed were...get this, employed by the government to do research on the attacks. I think there just may be something wrong with that.

Also, it was propaganda for the right....all it did was evoke emotion that had NOTHING to do with the theories. For example, they didn't interview any of the many people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and believe the government played a part in it. Just people who were offended.

I'm personally offended at the obvious bias in that piece of "journalism."

Answer 5

Conspiracy theorists ignore anything that can disprove their theories, or they would just say that the show was produced by the government in order to keep every one from seeing the truth. Just watch, they will make that show part of the conspiracy.

Answer 6

I'm confused. Conspiracy???? Then the planes that were filmed actually crashing into the world trade center were what????Window dressing??? And the huge chunks of a civilian aircraft that were pulled from the ruins of the Pentagon were what....planted by some mischievous elf?? And all the people who witnessed these aircraft slamming into their targets were what, a result of mass hypnosis??Conspiracy theorists need to get a life. Or stop smoking that whacky backy. Geeeeze!!!!!!!

Answer 7

I watched part of it. But I can watch the Twin Towers collapse only so many times before it gets to me. Aside from this I have no opinion on the conspiracy.

Answer 8

I saw an equally excellent program debunking the moon landing conspiracy theorists. They need to stick with Elvis sightings and the like.

Answer 9

It was a well prepared infomercial and all one needs to do is look up who owns the history channel to determine it's genuineness. I could tell you but that would result in others not doing their research. I see some here would rather thumbs down an answer than check for themselves so heres the info.

A&E Television Networks (AETN) a joint venture of The Hearst Corporation, ABC, Inc. and NBC Universal, is an award-winning, international media company offering consumers a diverse communications environment ranging from television programming, to home videos/DVDs and music CDs, to Web sites, as well as supporting nationwide educational initiatives.

AETN is comprised of A&E Network®, The History Channel®, History International™, The Biography Channel®, The History Channel en español™, Military History Channel™, Crime & Investigation Network™, A&E HD™, AETN International, and AETN Consumer Products.

Doesn't it seem a bit odd that the same people that own the Crime and Investigation Network could make a documentary but not see the inconsistencies in the 9/11 report or ask why the Pentagons defense systems failed.

BTW - They didn't shoot down anything I beleive.

Answer 10

No....but I won't believe any of it until the guys on Myth Busters do their show on 9/11....

:)