America isn't that stupid.
The corruption shows through even as recently as with the choice to use Diebold (Premier Election Solutions) machines at the Iowa straw poll. When the machines broke down, they chose to fix it and waste 2 hours instead of just doing a hand count because they didn't want the truth showing Ron Paul as winning that straw poll.
That would have given him National coverage as a winner and they couldn't have that!
But thats alright - he won Alabama in a landslide
Tom Tancredo - 0 (0%)
Sam Brownback - 2 (.75%)
John McCain - 2 (.75%)
Mike Huckabee - 6 (2%)
Rudy Giuliani - 7 (3%)
Fred Dalton Thompson - 9 (3%)
Duncan Hunter - 10 (4%)
Mitt Romney - 14 (5%)
Ron Paul - 216 (81%)
Some religous extreme right wingers are going to be very upset in 2008!
Ron Paul isn't going away - ignorance will not be bliss for you
2007-08-21 05:02:53 · 8 answers · asked by scottanthonydavis 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
And you my friend can have a heaping helping of Hannity/O'Reilly Koolaid
Look at the World - and they call me crazy - out of control war mongers
2007-08-21 05:27:35 · update #1
No Democrats are not the issue
Florida 2000 and Ohio 2004 are the issues
Clinton Curtis testified before court that Republicans approached him in Florida and asked him to create a vote flipping software that could corrupt the Diebold Voting Machine counts and flip the results to 51-49
The results in the 2004 Ohio election
Bush 51 - Kerry 49
Nice try Neocons
2007-08-21 05:54:43 · update #2
You would think, with all those supposedly fixed/rigged diebold machines.
That someone would be able to show atleast one of them , that was rigged ?
If they were rigged to switch ballots during an election, wouldn;t they still be rigged after the election ?
So how come no one has ever found one of those rigged machines yet ?
Don't democrats control most of the states now ?
Why would those democrats hide rigged voting machines ?
If diebold voting machines are rigged, explain the 2006 midterm elections ?
2007-08-21 07:38:21 · answer #1 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, it is no longer approximately election machines. it is approximately Rove on a venture to create human machines to spin lies and distortions so as that he can get yet another of his puppets into the White domicile to do extra ills to the country. Why do you think of he'd be so willingly barren region his puppet, Bush, at a time of his decline in history? according to possibility, the Riddler's forgetting that there are those hundreds of 1000's of lifeless American infantrymen and Iraqis whose spirits are probable no longer resting in peace and could hang-out him? you will likely manage human beings, yet in no way under pressure spirits. Even under pressure spirits are pronounced interior the Bible with Jesus having, working example, tochronic them into swines to bypass over the sting! :-) merely waiting for the day whilst Rove enters the assylum, possessed by skill of the under pressure spirits of the lifeless of the sick-fated Iraq warfare! And with him, his grimy conspirators...
2016-10-08 23:18:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sorry but rigging elections is the sign of democrats. Look at the elections bought by Unions and illegals.
2007-08-21 05:40:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If the last presidential election was "stolen," how come when the ACLU and liberal news organizations like the NYTimes counted and recounted those votes, hoping against hope that they could prove your baseless allegation, they discovered that not only did our President win, but he won overwhelmingly?
Thanks for pointing out how crazy Ron Paul and his supporters are. I had thought so, but you confirmed it.
2007-08-21 05:23:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's obivious that you support Ron Paul. If he is so smart he should know that he can't get elected as a Republican
2007-08-21 07:33:36 · answer #5 · answered by John 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So what happened in 2006?
Oh, and Ron Paul's a nut.
2007-08-21 05:08:41 · answer #6 · answered by thegubmint 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ron Paul shoudl refuse to appear on voting machines, after all, they aren't in the constitution.
2007-08-21 05:08:36 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Do you think you could ask this stupid question again....?
2007-08-21 05:17:16 · answer #8 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋