What is worse, the possibility of a Black president or a woman?
2007-08-21 03:09:06 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'd go with Obama. Race doesn't necessarily ruin someone's integrity, but with Hillary in office we'd go to war once every month. I think there was enough moral corruption present in the white house from one member of the clinton family, do we really need more?
2007-08-21 03:26:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
President Hillary Clinton and Vice President Barack Obama thank you for your words, though not encouraging. They know that you have the right to free speech and honor your right.
When Ms. Clinton is finished with her second term and we are once again basking in the light of a balanced budget, have many allies, have affordable healthcare for all, less crime, better education for all, and where we are begging foreign workers to come here because everyone is employed and we need more workers it will be time for Vice President Obama to run for President.
Mr. Obama may not win by the landslides of President Hillary Clinton but will do well in the elections for both his first and second term. By the end of his second term the nation will have advanced forward so much and so fast it will be time to rest awhile and maybe even step back slightly and thus time for another Republican President.
2007-08-21 10:24:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
There is no way Obama is even getting the nomination. Hillary has most of the billionaire donors and the big money behind her. She also has control of the party apparatus as an insider. She is already slicing and dicing Obama. He is going nowhere in the polls. Partly that is his own fault though. As for "possibility of a Black or woman" as president, I could easily vote for the right one. It's a safe bet the Democrats will never nominate a minority though. They only give the real power to wealthy whites. Note that Nancy Pelosi was made speaker of the house instead of the much more deserving (and more grounded) Harold Ford Jr. Hillary will be the nominee and there is absolutely no way I will vote for her. She just isn't trustworthy.
Kent in SD
2007-08-21 10:23:23 · answer #3 · answered by duckgrabber 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think a woman president would be great for the country, just not Hillary Clinton. How about Condoleezza Rice?
2007-08-21 11:10:26 · answer #4 · answered by Paul 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The worst thing for these so called United States would be for another puke to get in-that said I am going with Hilary due to her experience and also to get my president back in the white house. I hope Bill is ready to move back in :)
2007-08-21 10:22:17 · answer #5 · answered by liberalady 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for Obama if it was between these two. In my opinion, Hillary Clinton carries too much socialist baggage. I think she's also as slimy a politician as Richard Nixon.
2007-08-21 10:25:30 · answer #6 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They would both be good presidents so it's hard for me to say who would be worse. I think the Republican attack machine against Hillary would rev up on day one of her presidency, so Obama would have more of a fighting chance to accomplish something. Because of this, Obama would be the better choice.
The absolute worst alternative for our country would be another Bush or a super authoritarian like Giuliani.
2007-08-21 10:15:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Neither, just the possibility of Hillary.
But not for the reasons right-wingers keep crying about.
2007-08-21 10:15:59 · answer #8 · answered by avail_skillz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the best is barack obama. he is smart, knows the old political hacks stunts, and woould make a far superior pres to hillary. she just reflects the clinton era and based on her track record blows with the prevaling wind.
2007-08-21 10:15:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Hitlery Rotten Clinton is worse-at least Obama uses deodorant (at least I assume he does).
2007-08-21 10:15:14 · answer #10 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋