It is unfair if all is to be fair.... if such freedom is available, it is bound to be misused.
2007-08-21 03:36:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by small 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Disagree. Love is supposed to be wonderful. When in love those involved are not supposed to get hurt. Love is pure, raw emotion. War on the other hand is more mechanical. War is intended for those involved to be hurt. Both have strong emotions attached to them, but each is the opposite.
2007-08-21 09:25:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by RayChiLL 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I disagree. They are the opposites of each other. One should never hurt other people in the name of love. War is a physical act and not to be confused with an emotional feeling. Soilders must detach themselves of thinking of the enemy as a human being with loved ones. War in the social setting only means an enemy of yours. Still, you must not take his name and ruin it, or any of his property. War never resolved anything in a good way.
2007-08-21 09:20:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by red 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
disagree. its a nice phrase but it doesn't really work. this is allowing people to cheat, lie, deceive, and harm in order to win the war or attain love. sometimes nobility and justice need to override the 'any means to meet your desired ends' viewpoint.
2007-08-21 15:10:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Love- Gives Life
War- Kills many persons Lifes
2007-08-21 09:24:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rama Krishna 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
agree because in those topics its about surviving or getting the person you love and thats what is most important right?
2007-08-21 09:20:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by tacoroko 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
what goes around comes around.
2007-08-21 11:55:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by black_emo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋