English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

These are in order from 1 to 34:

Joe Montana
Dan Marino
Brett Favre
Bart Starr
Bob Griese
John Elway
Johnny Unitas
Peyton Manning
Roger Staubach
Joe Namath
Tom Brady
Fran Tarkenton
Terry Bradshaw
Phil Simms
Dan Fouts
Otto Graham
Troy Aikmen
Steve Young
Kurt Warner
Donovan McNabb
Daunte Culpepper
Jim Kelly
Warren Moon
Sammy Baugh
George Blanda
Len Dawson
Sonny Jurgensen
Bobby Layne
Y.A. Tittle
Jeff Hostetler
Norm Van Brocklin
Bob Waterfield
Michael Vick
Vinny Testeverde

http://www.listology.com/content_show.cfm/content_id.16816/Sports

Im just surprised that Vick is on there. Even before this dogfighting thing.. one of the greatest QBs of all time?

2007-08-21 02:06:04 · 23 answers · asked by ceadmilefailte1982 4 in Sports Football (American)

Really lyghtsout? I am not on any bandwagon.. I think he plays more for himself than for the team and that doesn't make you one of the greatest QBs of all time.

2007-08-21 02:49:02 · update #1

23 answers

Who dreamed this crap up? Culpepper? Vick? Kurt Warner? Testeverde? Heck I wouldn't put Farve that high, and likely wouldn't be putting McNabb on there. How the hell is Cunningham not on there? He paved the way for guys like Culpepper, Vick, McNabb, and the other running QBs and the difference was he was a good QB as well and McNabb is the only one who could be considered good within that list and I don't think he is, but some would argue.

2007-08-21 02:48:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

No. Montana and Elway are 1 and 2. Dan Marino and Joe Namath are the two most overrated players of all time. Both not in my top 34. Hostetler was an awful QB. Testeverde was a good QB and had a very respectable career, but he was really nothing special as a QB. Vick great scrambler, but he had a very inaccurate arm. Jim Kelly, Steve Young, are way to low on this list. Kurt Warner No way. Culpepper and McNabb have had some really great years and when there careers are over they both might be top notch in the Hall of Fame, but right now there's no way I can see them as all time top 21 QB's. Many of the QB'S are to high, or to low. No offense, but this is a really bad list.

2007-08-21 09:34:09 · answer #2 · answered by Escape 6 · 1 2

Lists like this are funny to me. What are they based on? Superbowls? 52 other guys on that team. Anyway, for fun, I like Montana, but Marino did more with a less talented team. Elway had to work harder and had that 2 minute drill down to a science. Namath was the one hit wonder of QB's, Bob Griese doesn't belong in the top ten because he was injured for most of that "perfect" season. Young should be in the top ten. Culpepper proved he's nothing without Carter and Moss to throw to. I like Fouts at #15. Manning will be regarded as the best ever.

2007-08-21 10:02:13 · answer #3 · answered by NInnyhammer 5 · 1 1

Definitely disagree with this list. The order is going to be debatable no matter what because it is impossible to compare a lot of the "old" leaguers with the "new" leaguers because the game has changed so much. Even comparing Marino and Favre is impossible. You have a million arguments both ways as to who is better.

My biggest gripe is where is Randall Cunningham??? If you have Vick, Hostetler, Testeverde, Warner, and McNabb on there, he definitely deserves a place. I'm assuming this list is old because Warner, Culpepper, and Vick all are on the list (entirely too high for all of them). McNabb is too high as well.

2007-08-21 09:38:14 · answer #4 · answered by Jim Baw 6 · 4 0

It is almost correct, but I believe that Steve Young, Troy Aikman, and Joe Namath goes above Peyton Manning, in 6-8. Brian Griese comes down and Vinny Testaverde goes up. Tom Brady is next to Brett Favre.

2007-08-21 09:13:46 · answer #5 · answered by Shockwave48 2 · 1 0

No, I don't think it is an accurate list.
Sammy Baugh was a far better QB for longer than Griese, for example, and he won more than Griese. Griese was really only the starter in the season for one of the Dolphins' two SB championship years and he threw a total of 7 passes in one of those Super Bowls.
Otto Graham played in 10 championships in 10 years--you've got him behind Phil Simms? The Giants won a SB with him but they also won one without him, led by the immortal Jeff Hostetler. (sp?)
I can't see any system for creating this list.

2007-08-21 09:21:35 · answer #6 · answered by Bucky 4 · 0 0

It looks like the list was made over two years ago. A lot has changed since then, obviously. I'm sure Vick wouldn't be anyone's list of best quarterbacks these days.

I also personally disagree with some of the ranks there. Kurt Warner seems a bit high on the list, and I'm not sure why Vinnie Testeverde is even on the list. But that's just my opinion.

2007-08-21 09:13:33 · answer #7 · answered by Secret Asian Man 6 · 2 1

Nope. Definitely don't agree with that list. Johnny Unitas only 7th? Otto Graham 16th? Not a chance. They are my #1 and #3, with Montana between the two. Bob Griese is totally overrated based on one super-awesome season. Culpepper is grossly overrated. Vick shouldn't be on the list, dogfighting or not. Maybe an easier question would be what do I not DISAGREE about on this list!

2007-08-21 09:16:15 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Taco 7 · 3 1

Griese, Namath, Brady, Simms are all way too high.
Pull them in the 20's, switch Montana and Marino, and your list looks pretty good.
Manning, of course, will be #1 in about 4 years though.

2007-08-21 10:19:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Moon and Young should be waaay higher on the list. What is the deal with Vick? He shouldnt even be in the same breath as most of the players you named,

2007-08-21 09:33:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers