Okay, here is the idea: Some women want to have kids and others don't. The ones that do usually believe in putting their children before there husband. Well, here is the solution. The man takes a woman who doesn't want children as his main wife. This way, she will always devote all her attention to him. Then he takes a woman who does as a concubine. Then he gets her a separate larger house next to his for her after she starts having kids. Then she can take care of the kids and he can visit them when he wants and visit her at night or send the main wife to help babysit. Then if she is too exhausted from the kids, no big deal, he can go out and doing something with the main wife. Usually, men want to pass their name on through kids and h ave a wife completely devoted to them. It just makes a lot of sense this way. Is this a genius plan or what??
2007-08-21 02:00:45 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Note: It does not swing both ways. It would be adultery if a woman had two men.
Source: Bible
2007-08-21 02:11:01 · update #1
living with just 1 woman drives most men crazy, so who needs 2?
2007-08-21 02:03:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is also adultery for a man too! SOME can't support 1 wife decently now-a-days much less 2! No offense to ANYONE!
2007-08-21 02:25:48 · answer #2 · answered by jasmin2236 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Adultery goes both ways. It is a contradiction in terms if it only applies to women. You just want multiple pots to dip your wick in, isn't that really the truth? Be honest with yourself and quit this justification that makes women to be like children or animals to you.
Using your logic, I'm a proud adulterer. I haven't yet found one male who's man enough to satisfy me alone...
2007-08-21 02:32:47 · answer #3 · answered by Erin 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ok so what if a woman wants to have a husband who pays the bills and then a "mancubine" to get freaky with? Does that door swing both ways?
2007-08-21 02:08:42 · answer #4 · answered by WonderTwit 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ingenius, yes. Practical, no.
Do I want to be the first wife with the mother of your children living next door?
No.
Do I want to be the exhausted mommy left next door while you party it up with Wife Number One ?
No.
Do I want to be Wife No. 1 partying it up with you while your exhausted wife maintains house and children next door?
No.
But maybe it might work.
2007-08-21 10:12:48 · answer #5 · answered by Puresnow 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It made sense back in Biblical days when the world was just beginning and God wanted people to populate it. Now we call that "Adultery."
2007-08-21 02:08:51 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i've got on no account primary a guy who replaced into getting "insanely loopy oral intercourse" to realize out to the ingredient to income for a mate earlier they reached all the way down to income who replaced into traveling Johnny. i'm uncertain what faith has to do with the definition. in case you probably did not consent, it replaced into a minimum of presumptuous, however the alcohol could desire to be mitigating in court docket. If it did not end once you suggested no, then it replaced into rape, no mitigation in touch.
2016-10-16 08:06:52 · answer #7 · answered by giardina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm all for the poly amorous life, BUT it should be 50 - 50.
if he can have a girl on the side, then i should have a guy on the side. and i WILL NOT be taking care of someone else's kids, you had them , you take care of them. and i would not want the other woman right next door !!!!!
2007-08-21 05:28:47 · answer #8 · answered by GOLDENFAIRY 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Man its not right!
Plus you have to think of that special time of the month when you become public enemy number one!
Not a good idea
2007-08-21 02:10:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'll be the one that doesn't like kids *raises hand* When do we start??? Do I get two husbands? The one with the brain in his head & the other with the......really large one....
2007-08-21 02:10:20 · answer #10 · answered by Freakgirl 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋