English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Are you, for or against the dodgey Human Rights Act?

Have you actually read it? It puts immigrant / foreign perpetraitors before UK victims of crime.

2007-08-20 23:14:23 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Usaisthebestest. Maybe in your country matey. The CIA basement would be very interesting to get into I'd guess.

2007-08-20 23:22:41 · update #1

10 answers

The Human Rights Act in the current format in the UK should be repealed as soon as possible.
Todays paper - the Italian murderer of Stephen Lawrence cannot be deprted back to Italy because he can't speak Italian.
HELLO!!!! - HE'S A F*CKING MURDERER!!!!! SEND HIM TO THE MOON, SEND HIM ANYWHERE BUT HE DOES NOT BELONG HERE.
This guy gave up his own Human Rights when he chose to murder someone else.

2007-08-21 09:58:18 · answer #1 · answered by phooey 4 · 0 0

it is somehting that your chum might could get somebody interior the criminal field to look at. the sole functin that uniforms serve so a techniques as public colleges is to make an effort to stifle independant concept and expression. that's in basic terms yet another ineffective rule it is beinf foisted on a phase of th inhabitants that doesn't have any say or representation in determination making technique. the assumption is to make truthfully everyone the comparable so as that no one quite concerns as a guy or woman. actually it quite is a fashion of programming the toddlers of united statesa. to have self assurance that being distinctive is unacceptable and that in case you at the instant are not what others say you're able to be you're valueless. that's not something better than an attempt to create a clean technology of obedient, hive-minded little worker drones that may not be able to even wipe their very own posteriors and not employing a map and exact training. And as a techniques simply by fact the "Rights of a youngster" element is going, the only precise it is in no way reported is the final of determination. those decrease than 18 do not likely have lots by skill of way of that throughout this united states. They bypass regulations that result them, yet do not provide them a voice. anybody that "claims" to symbolize their pastimes, in basic terms speaks of the justifications that passing suggested regulations could be advantageous to them. no one ever says, "those are the problems of the pepole that this regulation will effect." and that's simply by fact no one ever ASKS them. between the techniques that a society is judged is on how we take care of our teenagers, and by way of this united states, that scientific care is deplorable.

2016-11-13 01:38:44 · answer #2 · answered by riveria 4 · 0 0

The Human rights act is an attempt to legislate for a homogeneous society so philosophical and political aims can be reached.

Thank god it is being used to protect criminals. It is the only way the people can see how ludicrous it is and fight against it.

2007-08-21 00:25:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

as you said Human rights act. if we don't respect the HUMANS what are we protecting the hand full of dirt. we have to have the good balance with being protective of the people living in the UK and yet not be abusive to others LIVE AND LET LIVE i say.

2007-08-20 23:38:40 · answer #4 · answered by billu king 1 · 1 0

Against it
The criminals are laughing because they can hide behind it.
The victims of crime have always been second best defiantly not right

2007-08-20 23:59:45 · answer #5 · answered by Fallen Angel 4 · 1 0

Its a piece of paper. There are dark rooms in dark basements where things like this are ignored.

2007-08-20 23:20:05 · answer #6 · answered by usaisthebestest 3 · 0 0

the invasion is allowed because the bank of england is a corrupt crime cartel only wanting slaves and $$$$$$$ look up "the money masters"

2007-08-20 23:48:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes..without doubt. The sooner its abolished the better.

2007-08-21 03:28:30 · answer #8 · answered by JoJo 4 · 0 0

Scary Mary, i can bet you haven't read the Human right act...cos if you have you wouldn't be saying this utter rubbish coming out of your mouth

2007-08-21 00:59:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

no, if you mean for the individual who killed the headteacher.....he should be booted on the next bus home...who cares about HIS rights he lost them as soon as that poor man ceased breathing

2007-08-21 01:36:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers