What would people like to be referred to as from now on?
Personally, I would like to go with "justice seekers" and "Wishful thinkers"
(and before anyone says we don't need labels to put on different groups, you are right, but groups are gonna be labelled regardless of "rift causing" so we may aswell come up with names that every one agrees with, agreed?)
2007-08-20 23:04:06 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I'M A JUSTICE SEEKER!!!!!!!!!
Thanks Grumples I quite like that title.
Gill79:Justice Seeker.
I have to say for the record. We're not Anti-McCanns we're anti mccann parenting practises. Meaning we wouldn't do the same thing.
2007-08-21 01:42:54 · answer #1 · answered by gill79 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just consider the fact that everyone is an individual and although some people have similar views, everyone sees things differently and from a different perspective. Why do people have to refer to others with derogatory names? Why not just reword your questions and say something like 'I think this, does anyone else feel this way' and see what individuals think, rather than preempting what a whole group of people might think.
Although you appear to be bathing the wounds on here, by making a comment like 'justice seekers' and 'wishful thinkers' you are as ever making the rift grow stronger and causing more people to argue. Why not just accept that there has been wrong on both sides and until people stop attacking one another for thinking with a different mindset this place is going to just get worse and worse for bullying.
2007-08-21 00:07:43 · answer #2 · answered by peroxide.pixie 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
To be honest, it has got so nasty on here with regards to this now, that I am going to try and stop answering questions on this subject now. It is a forum and everyone is entitled to an opinion, but certain people who don't agree with another peoples questions or answers are getting so nasty now and are personally attacking people for the hell of it. I hate the labels that are used, I am a so called "anti McCann" just because I believe they were wrong for leaving their vulnerable children and because I am anti child neglect.
THE ONLY THING THAT MATTER HERE IS MADELEINE! Finding her safe and well is the only important thing. She IS the only innocent party in this and IS the only person who is suffering / has suffered through NO fault of her own. Why cant everyone just agree on that and stop bickering and trying to score points against each other. NONE of this is helping Madeleine is it?
2007-08-20 23:18:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm not too sure, I wasn't really aware of this issue...but i'd say probably 'the poor performance caused the rift'. What's for sure is both Sehwag and Dhoni are still key players and India need them performing and on the same page.
2016-05-18 22:06:29 · answer #4 · answered by rosia 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with labelling at all and I'm tired of saying I am not 'anti-McCann'
I think it is a ridiculous label
I just wanted to stand up and make my thoughts on child protection known and I should be entitled to do that. The McCann's broke the law yet when I write that I think some people actually read that as me saying "so what? they deserved to lose their daughter" I have never said that and wish people would read the written words and not what they think I am saying. You see that is the trouble with writing things down, what you say is open to much more interpretation.
2007-08-20 23:15:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
It's getting pathetic isn't it? People can't express their opinions, which they are perfectly entitled to have, without being thrown into one category or another.
What everyone needs to realise (yes, I do include myself in this too) is that this isn't about the "pros", the "antis" or even Kate and Gerry McCann, this is entirely about Madeleine and the injustice that has been done to her, both by her parents and the thing that took her.
2007-08-20 23:12:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Sticks and stones and all that.
People should be able to rise above all this anti/pro neglector stuff.
I'm not particularly bother about any of the fan/hater stuff as we all want to say our piece.
2007-08-20 23:23:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think "Madeleine supporters" is the only catagory there shoud be:
she is the only victim at the end of the day
and have a star grumples.xx
2007-08-21 03:12:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't think 'justice seekers' and 'wishful thinkers' are impartial labels and you won't get agreement. Think again and try to come up with something that doesn't pre-suppose the answer.
2007-08-20 23:08:10 · answer #9 · answered by Skidoo 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Call me "I`ve got a second chance" or so the hospital consultant said, lol.
2007-08-20 23:13:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋