Should foreigners who have committed serious crimes in the UK be throw out after they've served their time?

Question

A tribunal stated: "It would infringe his human rights if he was returned to Italy." The young man in question wasn't thinking about the human rights of the man he stabbed and murdered. Or the human rights of the widow and children of his victim.

Answer 1

I think that they should be extradited to the country from whence they came to serve their sentence, but preferably, not allowed here in the first place.

Do you remember all the fuss about Mike Tyson coming here because he was a convicted criminal. He was only coming here to fight for goodness sake, and then return home. Of course, the Liberal elite don't like boxing, nor the crime he had committed.

Answer 2

At last David Cameron has said something I can agree with - It is time the Human Rights Act be abolished in this country. No doubt it can serve a good purpose in many cases but it is abused by those who haven't a care about other peoples human rights. Perhaps we would have less of these cases if that criteria were used by the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.

Answer 3

If sending him to Italy would breach his human rights because he has no ties there, we should give him a boat with 14 days' supply of bottled water and a fishing line. Give him a direction to travel and advise him that if he returns to the UK's 12 mile limit he will be sunk by the Royal Navy.

This way he can go to wherever will take him and his human rights would remain intact.

He acted in a manner that would alienate him for UK society, therefore he cannot be a member of it and thus he should not be here or allowed to remain here.

Answer 4

Human Rights should apply to all cases heard before any Court. Both sides should be heard - for fairness to be established.
The decision the Court should reach must be in favour of the aggrieved and not the aggressor.

Any case involving a non National of the U.K. who is the perpetrator of a serious crime should be incarcerated for the time of the sentence and deported thereafter.

A person of any nationality who has sought and received asylum and commits a serious crime should not be allowed to stay in U.K. but again deported as 'Stateless' to any Country willing to take him/her.

Other Countries do not tolerate serious crime by foreigners, why should we?

Answer 5

If we were talking about a country where there was starvation, civil war or torture I might (just might) think about this question for more than a second, - but Italy!!!!! That's like saying it would infringe someones human rights by being sent back to England! - so his family might live here now - well if they want to be near the son they might be very proud of then let them go to Italy with him.

Answer 6

Can understand your feeling on this one. Human rights is a fine line, I fail to see how it would infringe his human rights to send him back to the country he came from. I would say the same should be done to a British person who went to another country and commited a crime.

Answer 7

Here is yet another reason we should withdraw from the Common Market. Left to British Law this sub-human would be deported but EU Laws will not allow us to do this. How you all gonna vote come the next election ? UKIP?

Answer 8

Any immigrant that commits any crime that they could be incarcerate for should be deported. It's about time people started looking at the human rights of the community instead of the criminal.

Answer 9

yes. They forfeit their rights to live in England when they commit a serious crime there. The law is an *** and common sense has been lost along the byways of political correctness.

Answer 10

Yes that's what we do in Australia if they aren't naturalized they get deported the day they leave prison ironical really when you think we started out as a penal colony.