English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

He misspoke and later corrected his statement. It happens.

2007-08-20 20:54:02 · answer #1 · answered by James L 7 · 0 0

Link?

Cause, from what I know the FAA had the plane phones on listening to the passengers beat down the cockpit door. Lots of yelling and screaming was heard, then nothing. And, if I remember correctly the fighter jet pilots that were closing in on Flight 93 did not have time to have their planes armed with missles when they were scrambled.

Is this rush to start more 9/11 conspiracies because The History Channel debunked years of b.s. conspiracy theories in under 2 hours?

2007-08-21 03:10:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why would the government try to hide the fact that it had shot down the plane. That would have been the legal and rational thing to do. There does not need to be a cover up if everything was done right.

IF he said that he probably misspoke, he might have been under a little stress that day.

2007-08-21 03:36:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There was so much going on that day that keeping all of it fresh and updated between the players was very difficult!

I wish I could have listened into all of the cell phone calls between Cheney, Bush, Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Rove and Libby and others that day!

Dirty B@stards!

2007-08-21 03:37:58 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Because he was a liar just like the rest of the administration...once again science fact proves that a trail of debris for several miles from flight 93 and the cons will refute it...they will never admit the atrocities committed by the Bush administration that day...

2007-08-21 03:10:35 · answer #5 · answered by ClashMan 2 · 1 3

The truth will out one day.... they still refuse to hold an independent inquiry into all the circumstances surrounding that day... until they do I will always doubt the official explanations... just don't trust Government.

2007-08-21 04:47:03 · answer #6 · answered by Dream Realized 2 · 0 0

Because what he said the first time was not the truth and he had to correct himself. Guess none of us ever said anything with a slip of the tongue.

2007-08-21 03:24:59 · answer #7 · answered by Jeff E 4 · 0 0

Prove it. Why do people like you feel it necessary to keep trying to find ways to prove some kind of conspiracy theory is true? Show us something that hold scientific fact, that has no political aspects in it, and maybe it would be a worthy topic to discuss.

2007-08-21 03:10:47 · answer #8 · answered by woodchipper890 4 · 2 2

He must not have listened to his publicist.

2007-08-21 03:08:25 · answer #9 · answered by Jai 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers