English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How do you explain the makers of "Loose Change" radically revamping their original film to exclude previous controversial claims (such as the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled explosions)? Are they now "gatekeepers" who are working for the Bush administration?

Is it not the case that the Bush administration, the neocons, their Democratic enablers, etc. are BAD ENOUGH without erroneously blaming them for 9/11?

Do you not understand that, for your theories to hold water, they require quasi-religious leaps of faith and an almost pathological aversion to physical evidence?

And finally, do you understand how your charges against the Bush administration DETRACT from legitimate criticism?

2007-08-20 19:40:25 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

5 answers

There is no set of charges too fantastic for a cabal that has so thoroughly trashed the US. Here is a partial list:

1. Loss of posse comitatus

2. The Patriot Act

3. The Homeland Security Department

4. Invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan

5. Turning the US military into mercenaries.

6. Attempts to destroy Social Security

7. Attempts to destroy the environment

8. Attempts to destroy K-12 education

9. Destruction of US world reputation.

2007-08-20 19:50:56 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0 2

Conspiracy theorist do not have any hardcore evidence to prove their theories. None, zilch!

All they ever do is ask "why did this happen, and why did that happen". They have no evidence to stand on.

To the poster below me: nope! They don't have any GOOD answers on the eyewitnesses who seen with their OWN EYES the plane go into the tower, yet they claim that the towers were rigged with explosives. They changed their theory on the cell phone calls, but have not given a good response on their change of thought.

Not only that, there is no logical way the gov't could have orchestrated such a big deception. There's way too many people who would have to be involved. No explanation from them on that.

2007-08-26 05:33:25 · answer #2 · answered by The Skiier 3 · 1 0

Thank Heavens we have people who ask questions! Without questions, the answers are never found!

Most of the posters on here may be too young to remember the Watergate investigation. Two young reporters braved just such language as the posters here are using, waded through the BS to bring down a corrupt President and his equally corrupt Administration.

I don't think the towers were brought down with bombs, but I sure wouldn't put anything past those middle-aged morons who systematically led our country into Iraq, without a thought to the dire consequences of such a scheme.

One thing 9/11 accomplished was to take a fear-filled, angry nation and push it into war....not a just and retaliatory war against the perpetrators of the terrorist act, but a war with a country that really had nothing to do with it.

At the same time, our freedoms, our civil liberties, our cherished Constitution was being whittled away, carefully, craftily, with each step using the War on Terror as an excuse. How convenient 9/11 was to these people! How carefully they plotted their way toward their goals!

Don't ever, ever criticize anyone asking questions about anything concerning our government. Otherwise, we are a nation of sheep being led to the slaughterhouse by corruption and violence. Only when people demand answers does the truth finally emerge.

Sure, some people get carried away with conspiracy theories and far-out conclusions. But if Woodward and Bernstein hadn't asked those questions, Richard Nixon would have continued to collect his Hate List, using governmental agencies to retaliate against enemies, the IRS, the FBI, the CIA and others.

If you don't want a fascist government, ask questions. If you want to preserve freedom, ask questions. If you value our Constitution, keep asking questions....until you get it right! Then take steps to correct the situation, as we did when Nixon resigned. We didn't hang him. We didn't imprison him. We simply took him out of the Presidency and allowed him to become the Elder Statesman he was in his later years.

2007-08-29 00:15:39 · answer #3 · answered by Me, Too 6 · 0 0

well put its the boy who cried wolf. If they took up legit arguments with believable facts they would have more of an audience.

People hear so much bull that when these groups say something legit or not people think here we go again and only passivley listen.

2007-08-21 02:50:12 · answer #4 · answered by Geoff C 6 · 1 0

This is what the corporate misinformation society would have you believe. They're not. go to their web site. Or check out the video and related links on google video

2007-08-26 14:08:57 · answer #5 · answered by UNCLEJIMMY143 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers