Why Do Conspiracy Theorists Feel the Bush Administration Is Behind 9-11?

Question

Lets for one second quit debating about the temperature steel melts, the temperature a hydrocarbon based fuel burns, controlled demolitions, missiles, and other common points of contention…

Everything the Bush administration has touched has been a dismal failure. Off the top of my head, I can not even think of anything that the Bush administration has done that I would call a hallmark of success.

The administration couldn’t even get its intelligence right when Iraq was invaded. Once in Iraq, the military is under equipped and is in a losing battle against insurgents. The administration had days notice for Hurricane Katrina…what could have been a shining moment was a terrific example of what not to do. I could go on and on about failures of the Bush administration.

I have two questions for the conspiracy theorists who believe 9-11 was an inside job:

1. What has Bush and his administration done that makes you believe they have the organization, mental capacity, and the ability to pull off something like 9-11?

2. Even if Bush or someone in his administration could pull off the job in the first place, why has no one stood up and said “I was involved! Here is how it was done! I am sorry for what I did!” Obviously, this would have to be a group effort. Even if the group involved was hand picked, wouldn’t at least one person have remorse about killing 3000 of their own countrymen? Let’s face it, if it were an inside job, the plan would be executed by pawns, not the Bush’s, Cheney’s, or other high ranking officials in the government. Would these pawns actually care about potential budgets, circumventing the constitution, and waging war in the middle east enough to keep silent (personally I would find that hard to believe).

I could buy the fact that intelligence dropped the ball or the administration just ignored the threat.

Answer 1

1) Nothing

2) The only "inside" job that the bush administration was capable of pulling of as a team was diverting attention from the significant problem at hand (i.e. Afghanistan and Osama Bin Lootin') and reverting attention to address the primary concern of the bush administration which was obviously Iraq. Not the answer you are looking for, but IMHO that is the only job they are capable of pulling off.

While it can be said that removing hussein did provide some minimal act toward relieving terrorism, I would have preferred we spend our 12 million/billion a day toward killing the muthafucka hiding in the cave that started it all.

We should not have allowed our gubmint to focus on Iraq in the first place. We should have "stayed the course" and said "lets roll" to defeating that osama guy. Now we have spent BILLIONS and are no further along or better off than we were the few short days after 911.

If our Sons and Daughters are going to die in defense of this country, make their lives worth the cost by attacking the faction that almost destroyed us in the first place.

Answer 2

You're kidding, right? You clearly don't remember the world on September 10, 2001. Bush was the biggest irrelevant joke of a leader who had no power to promote his own agenda. A month later he's a hero with an approval rating of over 90%. As long as he kept the American people quaking in the boots about terrorist threats, he could pass any piece of legislation he wanted. And he did. Most of it related to helping out the 400 richest American families. I don't think Bush orchestrated 9/11, but clearly, there were huge benefits to be reaped from such a scheme. The only person on the planet who benefited more than George Bush was perhaps Gary Condit. On September 10, 2001, it was all Condit all the time in the news media. The guy couldn't take a dump without someone asking him about his missing girlfriend...

Answer 3

I would not consider the events of 9-11 to be a 'success' - there was enough credible evidence left behind to effectively demonstrate that this might have been an "inside job".
Secondly, I don't think the "Bush administration" had anything to do with the tragedy. There are soldiers, trained killers, mafia hitmen and paid mercenaries all over this cruel world who will kill other human beings without so much as the loss of a night's sleep.
I do think it's possible that the Bush administration ordered the 'terrorist attack', or at least 'suggested' it to some dark and sinister entities in the bowels of our government.
The 'coincidences' are just too 'coincidental' to be mere 'coincidences':
* Larry Silverstein was a friend of the Bush family, and his Twin Towers were hemorrhaging millions of dollars in financial losses;
* George W. Bush's younger brother was in charge of security for the building complex;
* Countless experts, witnesses, observers, and theorists have come forward to claim the buildings were planned demolitions;
* Demolition crews were in the building - on unoccupied floors - just days before the explosions;
* An 'investigation' was hurriedly conducted and scrap from the buildings was suddenly used in the construction of a new U.S. battleship instead of being stockpiled for further studies, research and investigation.

I think the Bush administration failed at this attempt to pull off a 'terrorist attack'; successful saboteurs would not have left so much damning or questionable evidence behind.
This was not as 'pristine' a crime as was - perhaps - the Kennedy assassination. It was, in some circumstances, actually sloppy. Consider the events at Cleveland's Hopkins Airport at the exact time of the incidents in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

I believe 'we the people' have a constitutional right - and obligation - to hold our government to a modicum of skepticism, doubt and mistrust, considering all the times it's lied to us before, especially since the Fourth Estate no longer takes its job as watchdog very seriously. -RKO- 08/20/07

Answer 4

Do you think that Bush sat down and drew out the plans on his etch-a-sketch? no. Of course he wasn't involved in any part of the operation, but he may have ordered a false flag operation that would give him the pretext that he needed to achieve what he wanted to with his time in the white house. Of course, this is all theory, since none of this could be proven without stealing papers out of the national archives, but there is physical evidence that does NOT support the government's story. So the wise thing to do is not point the finger until it is more properly investigated.

Don't you think if you were involved in something so secretive, that your life would be at risk? You would probably not sit down with Chris Matthews and tell them the story. You may, however, tell some friends who promise not to give you away; but how can that make a difference, since everyone is just going to call them crazy anyways?

There have been prominent people in the 9/11 truth movement who were formally in high positions in the government, such as Dr. Robert M. Bowman, Lt. Col., USAF, who headed the star wars project under Reagan.

Go to http://patriotsquestion911.com/ to read about all of the other prominent people in the 9/11 truth movement.

Answer 5

Conspiracy theorists feel the way they do about Bush because they don't like him and obvisiously did not when he was elected the first time. Therefore they feel they have to blame someone for what's happened. There has been evidence that the Clinton administration knew the attacks were going to happen but yet did nothing to stop it. And true there was days notice about Hurricane Katrina and if you had paid attention to the news you have heard that Pres. Bush urged the mayor of New Orleans and governor or Louisianna to order an evacuation right away instead of when they waited around like that did.

Answer 6

I don't for one, believe that. Bush's crowd of thugs is not capable of a MIHOP, but LIHOP ? Absolutely.
They will shred the Constitution, start phoney wars, kill innocent people for political gain and steal elections, but when one considers the incompetant cronyism that riddles this administration, I can't see this being a conspiracy, like JFKs death. No way Bush and his crowd could have pulled this off. I do think they would allow it to happen if it gave them more POWER.

Answer 7

Yup it is Bush's fault, every bad thing that ever has happened is Bush's fault. He killed Elvis, caused Pearl Harbor, bombed the twin towers and was the shooter on the grassy knoll.
Remember the media quoted "sources in the Bush Administration" He has a time machine, didn't you know that?

Answer 8

I would disagree with you on the conspiracy theory except for on ironic fact.... Bush having dinner with the Saudi Royals and flying them all out of the country. All he cares about is money and the corporate power, oil companies included. He could give a flying fig about this country.

Answer 9

I just saw a special about the 911 conspiracy stuff on the history channel. Any evidence of direct government envolment in the 911 attacks has never been found. Experts from popular mechanichs and elseware proved there were no bombs or demolitions. To this day noone has found explosive wire or anything and until they do there is no argument for the government envolved 911 conspiracies.

Answer 10

Well I'm going to say I'm glad someone finally pointed out that this isn't something our current government could have pulled off with any finesse. But I will say Conspiracy Theorist also believe (David Icke) that most of the world leaders are actually lizard space aliens in human suits.... so why are we even listening to them???