2007-08-20 14:37:45 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush is losing ground against terror with every day he spends in Iraq.
Also, bin laden only expected his stooges to have 20 minutes maximum on 9-11 before US air defenses responded. Bush gave him over 2 hours.
Much as I hate to say it, bin laden is winning.
2007-08-20 14:43:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Here are Bin Laden's attacks during the Clinton era.
1993 WTC
1996 Khobar Towers bombing 19 AIRMAN DEAD 300
WOUNDED
1998 U.S. Embassy bombings over 5,000 injured
2000 U.S. Cole Bombing
Clinton/Bush since it took 6 to 8 years to plan 9-11 3,000 Americans dead.
Under Bush Osama and the boys are on the run and numerous TERROR plots have been uncovered and stop not only in the U.S. but in Europe as well, also top Generals in Osama organization are now dead or about to be
Now Left wing nuts and the uneducated Bush hating flock will say Bin Laden
The Truth the United States and Bush
2007-08-20 14:51:42 · answer #2 · answered by dez604 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
nicely once you have guy in charge that doesn't have the English skills of a extreme college sophomore then what are you able to assume. Hell yeah they choose the conflict on terror. without worry then he has no foundation to run his administration and Bin weighted down isn't discovered.
2016-10-08 22:34:26 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The United States , along with the Middle East leaders , are winning. Bin Laden is dead and it is only a matter of time till this evil force dies out.
2007-08-20 14:54:58 · answer #4 · answered by Norskeyenta 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
right now Bush but if the war goes without good leadership for too much longer or a liberal takes control of the white house then Bin Laden will be winning.
2007-08-20 14:50:53 · answer #5 · answered by Razgriz01 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Well Bin Laden still is on the run isn't he? I think you can figure that one out on your own.
2007-08-20 15:22:29 · answer #6 · answered by Lindsey G 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
"terror" is an emotion and a tactic. You can't have a war against an emotion or a tactic.
The whole concept of "war on terror" is meaningless. It's like a comic book view of the world.
You have to elevate the debate to a rational level, such as a clash of cultures, or an economic battle for global markets, or something like that.
2007-08-20 14:45:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Personally? Well, Bin Laden is in a cave somewhere in Pakistan picking lice from his beard and probably eating it and then washing it down with stale water, while Bush is in the White House dining on steak, lobster and caviar and chugging some non-alcoholic champagne.
I guess what I'm really trying to say is that I don't know.
2007-08-20 14:45:36 · answer #8 · answered by Bumblebee711 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Bin laden is half rotted in a cave somewhere.
We are winning, not Bush not anyone one person WE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ARE WINNING. don't let the news tell you differently.
2007-08-20 15:29:39 · answer #9 · answered by james s 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bin Laden is winning. He is why the US is so screwed up with paranoia.
BTW, how is the hunt for him going in Iraq?
Oh, wasn't he from Saudi Arabia?
Thanks for the 2 points fairy-tale US-is-winning believers!
2007-08-20 14:54:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋