Is Hillary best known for setting the women's movement (NOW) back, 50 years?

Question

Hillary lost her "feminst" integrity leading the disparagments and attacks against any of the several dozen women who would tell the truth about Bill; however, when she conspired with N.O.W. to attack the victim (Paula Jones) the end result, N.O.W. has been totally discredited and no longer has any influence.

Will Hillary be known in history best, for her failed socialized medicine, failed Presedential bid or setting the women's rights movement so far back, they no longer have any political influence?

Answer 1

Hilliary doesn't represent any womans movement she is an extension of Bill Clinton whom after not being impeached decided to place his wife in a strategic position as senator so that the bylaws of the election would be represented and he could get back into power. Some people don't know when to quit. Think about it. Do you not think that persons plan ahead and that the flag waving and Bush patronizing was for his own good.

Answer 2

Yeah, you wish.

Hillary did not set the movement back 50 years.

You and your fellow repubnazis (and I suspect that you, like most of them, have a penis and are therefore unreliable in matters such as this) have been trying to do so and are hopeful you will succeed, but the fact is that the most likely successor to Bush does not have a penis. And the movement goes on and forward and is unstoppable. Most of the current enrollment at Harvard Law School is sans penis. The same is true of most law schools these days. It's just a matter of time.

Answer 3

NOW is NOT the 'women's movement'. NOW is the National Organization of Women. It has been counter-productive for women for many years.

Yes, NOW has set back the women's movement by 50 years. NOW is a self-serving joke - but then, so is Hillary. How sad.

Answer 4

no she is actually better known as the wife of slick willy.

Answer 5

buddy