What are your views on the North American Union ??

Question

http://www.augustreview.com/issues/general/toward_a_north_american_union_200608181/

is the way its happening even constitutional? Can our leaders enter into agreements and make american citizens subjects of a greater entity?

Answer 1

I'm not sure I buy it but I would be against it.

Answer 2

Simply put - it SUCKS.

And no, it is NOT constitutional at all. The very fact that the 'leaders' of the three countries have mostly carried on these meetings in secret without any oversight from other elected representatives is the first indication that something is rotten.
But if the people of the three countries don't raise he** about it, it just might wind up as reality.
Phone the White House comment line
202-456-1111

Answer 3

The Europeans, as I understand it, were at least allowed to vote on their union. Will we get the same opportunity? Somehow I doubt it since it is being kept so hush-hush. Where the heck is the American media on this!?!?! Useless.

I personally don't have any problem with free trade, but I have a problem with entering into trade agreements with countries that are constantly violating human rights and I have a problem with trade monopolies. If only we were really talking about "free" trade.

Answer 4

My ex-spouse has the comparable variety of facial seems and smiles that Hillary has, and that they are as phoney as a three dollar bill - all self-serving, egocentric, performs to the group and not certainty, and she or he does not get it or does not care to. it incredibly is all approximately "her" and what she needs. Worst of all, my ex-spouse is emotionally disturbed, and that i see Hillary the comparable way. Hillary merely hasn't found out from her previous mess ups - the ordinary well being Care flop, bill's womanizing (she could desire to have comprehend and merely exceeded over it), the destruction of united statesa.'s vaccine industry by ability of attempting to dictate expenses in a unfastened industry, and she or he would be in a position to not exchange. She merely spins each thing (-massive suitable-wing conspiracy-, etc.); shifts the blame and on no account takes duty. till those variety of previous fossil liberals like McGovern, Soros, Carter, Mondale, Kennedy, Kerry and finally Clinton pass off-degree with their previous drained tax-n-spend, minority-first, socialist united statesa. recommendations and failed agendas, we are caught with them. yet she'll on no account have my vote.

Answer 5

A quick glance at the answers to this questions proves once and again why our country is in such trouble. Americans are so stupid these days, they are like sheep being led to the slaughter, without a care, without a worry. They don't realize whats being done to them until its too late.

China is a great example, it started off innocent enough, but look at where we are now. By the way one of the arguments from the pro amero unionists is to be able to compete with the emerging china. yeah the same china that they helped emerge. Follow the money, and ask who wins and who loses with each one of these strategies, and the answer is eerily the same every time.

Answer 6

IF it happens it will be happening the same way Socialism, Environmentalism and every other goofy idea that is severely bad for America has happened.

The people that are for it will get good publicity for it and get Hollywood to back it.

Everyone against it will be labeled heretics, fascist, racist, hatemongers, and every other name they can come up with to discredit opposing views without actually debating the views.

Answer 7

Our leaders can do what they want. I just know that if I see soldiers from other countries on American soil, I'm going to take a shot at them.

Answer 8

certainly looks like they're headed that way. decision was made a couple years ago while everyone was focused on the war in iraq. they're sneaking all sorts of krap into the system. if we protest bush will invoke presidential homeland security directive 52. (makes him the head of the judiciary and legislature).

i see some that deny it exists. for them, this is also called SPP. http://www.spp.gov/ wake up and smell the starbucks.

Answer 9

It is a fictitious bogeyman. There will never be a North American Union, at least not in the foreseeable future.

And there's been no agreements, no working towards such a thing, anyway.

Just another unsupported, non-factual conspiracy theory.

Answer 10

Man, there is not going to be a North American Union, something like that would have to be put to the voters. Get over it. I don't know who is feeding you guy's this stuff.

Answer 11

I am not for it. It seems like an easy way to get rid of the immigration problem. You don't legislate to cater to a problem. You legislate to prevent and stop problems...