English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As america flaunts international law and human rights and is now thinking of attacking pakistan. do you think that the USA /G W BUSH and his current policies and directives to tackle terrorisum he has and is creating, not to mention the kiddnapping of anyone from any country no matter what that countries courts say the USA can do. Could the USA/ G W BUSH be setting up WW3 and not really see what he is doing. are the american people so blind.

2007-08-20 08:08:41 · 16 answers · asked by IHATETHEEUSKI 5 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

That is exactly what Bush Administration trying to do.
Invasion of Iraq was INTENDED to destabilize region.
War is what BUSH wants.
How determined to stop terrorism or catch bin Laden could the Bush Administration be?
They turned their backs on Afghanistan...
WHEN THE U.S HAD THE HIGH MORAL GROUND.
When we were bombing TORA BORA with daisy cutter bombs.

And then the BUSH Administration presented the country with a PACK OF LIES about Saddams imminent threat.
And unfortunately....we believed him...that was a mistake.

So now we stuck with 12 billion a month tab.
A terrorists Recruiting and training NIRVANA.
The word of the U.S.A is worthless everywhere on the planet except maybe Albania.
Fighting a War in a country whose leadership is on vacation.
And how many dead Servicemembers?
Has it hit 4000 yet?
And as far as Bush and his handlers are concerned...it can hit 40,000
And we will NEVER know how many Iraqis were killed in this nightmare the CONSERVATIVES
have conjured up for us.
And no end in sight.

GEORGE BUSH did the will of his NEOCON handlers and DUPED the AMERICAN PEOPLE.
Congress and Senate included.
And the Media just went along with it!!!!!!!!!
Imbedded reporters!....how exciting....why it's almost like a made for TV movie.....and don't need pyrotechnics people for explosive effects...cause we got the real thing.......
show biz.......
selling advertising...

maybe they could have risked a little advertising revenue and done their jobs and told the PUBLIC THE TRUTH......
a couple of savvy investigative reporters could have found the flaws in CONSERVATIVE justifications for invasion of IRAQ.
At least enough to get people thinking about 2 years earlier than they did.

And caught up in some nearly mass hysteria knee jerk reaction of wanting to string MURTHA up.....
remember that?
He was a traitor ...a coward.....he was a old fat piece of ****.....
AND HE WAS RIGHT.

THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE DECEIVED.
period.
Do you think that if BUSH stepped to podium and announced that we were going to invade IRAQ because they have a lot of oil...and that we were going to fight a war to benefit big business....

Do you think AMERICANS would have gone along with THAT?

Bush's handlers might have invaded IRAQ on some pretense without 911.
But 911 left American people rattled....SUSCEPTABLE...
and DUBYAS handlers jumped right on it.
A GOLDEN OPPORTUNITY!!
and who cares about a couple of towers?
WHO DO YOU THINK IS GOING TO REBUILD THEM?
Some big business guys

And I suspect that DUBYAS Evangelical PRAYER BUDDIES were telling him stories about Armegeddon and how he might play a part in bringing "prophesies" to fruition.
THAT DOESN'T SEEM VERY FARFETCHED.
So add some LUNACY to the mix.

I just love to rant....raahhly i do:):):)

2007-08-20 09:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by zes2_zdk 3 · 1 1

Before you make accusations you should provide proof. Who has been Kidnapped?

I do not agree with Bush's policies but I do not think he will start WW III. How many Innocent people have been killed prior to 911 due to Terrorist attacks in Europe? I would say they have violated International Law and Human Rights. Should the world just sit back and let terrorist bomb train stations and other public areas.

2007-08-21 02:40:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush has already started WW3, however he calls it a war on terror. In WW2 the various invaded countries had loyalists who continued the war, in the same way that the Iraqi and Afganistani people are, who were helped from Britain. Expect to be a long time in Iraq and Afganistan as they will not give up as it is their country what ever you may think.

2007-08-20 19:27:39 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There is still plenty of time in WW3.
A World War requires 2 powerful blocks, till date only 1 is available. Even if the whole Muslim World gets united they cannot match Israel, lets forget US. Many people talk of China & Russia supporting the Muslim World, may be its true in certain cases in UNO but that is just to oppose US. They themselves have problems in their Muslim majority provinces. Hence there is no possiblity of WW3 in near future.

2007-08-21 00:11:53 · answer #4 · answered by navin9876 1 · 0 0

As the wife [British] of a ret, weapon,s chief & vietnam vet U.S.A.F. Yank,s flaunt everything they come in contact with all the chair,s they want to sit on with one bum.The Americans are blind, WW3 Super Power Hello, not to mention "The American Dream" they are brainwashed with.

2007-08-20 10:54:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The war on terror is world war 3 isn't it. Think about it, Muslims have declared Jihad against the west, Muslims live all over the world. That sounds like a world war to me, it may only be in it's early stages but if we go to war with Iran things could rally start to kick off.

2007-08-20 10:30:38 · answer #6 · answered by Martin 3 · 1 1

Bush is a power mad crazed man he believes he is doing the right thing the guy will do what ever he thinks he can and believes America to be untouchable, now do not say 911 was a attack on the states this man attacked his own people.
because of this bush is the most dangerous person in the world and yes to your question anything is possible with him.

i love America and Americans i do not love bush and fear him

regards x Kitti x

2007-08-20 08:14:33 · answer #7 · answered by misskitti7® 7 · 5 3

If Iran sends a nuclear bomb at Israel then the effects of that should probably initiate worldwide conflict 3. i think of that they are going to be stopped earlier they get a nuclear bomb nevertheless.

2016-10-08 22:02:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Considering the past and present, this is basically why, world dislike US.
America always does what she wants, despite others views and rights. Take others natural sources, regional interests, etc.

Then here comes bush and takes "way few steps further"!
FEW TOO MANY unjust, inhuman, witless, revolting steps!

2007-08-20 08:28:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

nah.. at some point.. if we were to push too hard.. Britain would scold us... and being scolded by them is kind of like a parent sending you to your room... :P

But seriously.. anything is possible.. but the current administration only has 1 year left.. they would have to move fast to start WW III.. and the public is watching every move AND Congress is not behind Bush now.

We should be able to weather the next year.. and hope we elect a President who is good at foreign policy.

2007-08-20 08:14:10 · answer #10 · answered by pip 7 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers