Are they feeling nostalgic and voting for Hillary is the only way to get Slick Willie back in office?
2007-08-20 06:47:22 · 14 answers · asked by Frank Dileo 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No way, Hillary wants to be the boss. If Bill even starts to work a little bit as a negative for her she will cut him loose in the blink of an eye. She has only stayed with him this long because she is more interested in her political career than in her husbands fidelity.
2007-08-20 07:05:39 · answer #1 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
This, to me, is the most amusing of the slams that cons think up about Hillary. The thought that Sen. Clinton is tractable enough or dumb enough to be a decoy for getting her husband back in office is certainly a funny one. Anyone who really knows anything about her knows she is more than capable of running this country, whether she is elected or not. She's been training for this since she took Wellesley by storm, long before she ever met Bill Clinton. She's scary intelligent and has been very effective in the Senate. Even the other side of the aisle holds her in great respect and gives her kudos, though grudgingly of course.
Keep underestimating her, it's one of her best weapons in the fight against the neocons. It's almost as though people who suggest this sort of thing are helping her to get elected, especially when the suggestions are as absurd as this one.
2007-08-20 14:14:28 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually I know quite a few people who would love to see Bill back in charge, but they balk at the prospect of having Hillary in the driver's seat.
Which is funny, seeing as how my family, at least, thought she was the one with the most action, last time around.
2007-08-20 13:56:02 · answer #3 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hillary is far too intelligent to let Bill be the real Commander in Chief. Give it up buddy, you have no clue. I personally never voted for Bill, and I won't vote for Hillary. But, there is one thing for sure, she is very very intelligent and very hard working. Even Newt Gingrich acknowledges that. Unfortunately, we cannot say the same about the intelligence or work ethic of any of the Republican candidates. I suggest you concentrate on your own candidates faults and what they stand for because by the looks of it, they don't stand for much.
2007-08-20 13:55:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
LOL.
No, I'm not voting for Hillary because I don't feel she's going to make much progress; she plays it too safe. Although I admit I would love to have Bill back in the White House, even as a guest!
That won't make me vote for Hillary, though.
2007-08-20 14:04:12 · answer #5 · answered by spike_is_my_evil_vampire 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why is it difficult for the right to distinguish between two individual people? Hillary and Bill are not one in the same.
2007-08-20 14:15:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
If it'd make you mad to have Bill back in the White House, then~ heck yea.
It's be that same warm fuzzy feeling cons had for Bush part 2.
2007-08-20 14:12:22 · answer #7 · answered by Nurse Winchester 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dang, you're onto us. Your house will be the first stop for the black copters when Willie regains the White House.
2007-08-20 14:24:28 · answer #8 · answered by Brian A 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They think she is as leftist as they are. She would wear the pants, not Bill. She's a smart woman but power hungry and not trust worthy. Peace
2007-08-20 14:04:06 · answer #9 · answered by PARVFAN 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Do you feel that threatened by Hillary, that it comes down to this crap?
No, she can handle things on her own.
2007-08-20 14:07:08 · answer #10 · answered by angelpuppyeyes 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋