Chris Webber, definitely. Glenn "Big Dog" Robinson was good, but nowhere as good as Webber was in their primes.
2007-08-20 06:45:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chris Webber played for more winning teams and was the best player on those teams. The Milwaukee Bucks never started winning until Ray Allen and Sam Cassell joined Robinson. Although Robinson did win a ring in 2005 riding the bench with San Antonio. Chris Webber also gets the nod because he lasted longer and was able to play at a higher level for a longer period of time than Robinson.
2007-08-20 23:43:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by filipinoghettoman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Chris Webber
2007-08-20 14:02:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Matt 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
it was said by a few 'experts' that if glenn robinson had declared for the 93' draft...he would've been the #1 pick in the draft over webber. i also read in some scouting reports that robinson played similarly to the late len bias.
what a joke. big dog had a good career but as a #1 pick he was a flop. not as big a flop as say pervis ellison or michael olowokandi...but more along the lines of a joe smith...someone who had a few good seasons but never went to the level they thought he would go...basically a dissappointment.
webber was having a potential hall of fame career until he trashed his knee 4 years ago in the playoffs against dallas.
say what want about webber, his toughness and never beng able to win the big one (college, pros)...but u will pretty much will always remember 2 things about his game...having possibly the best hands in the game...and his incredible passing.
what can u say about big dog? nothing about his game was really remarkable on the pro level...
2007-08-21 09:20:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by carlos l 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're kidding me right!? Chris Webber all day!
More ppg, rpg, apg, minutes per game, and a lot of other stuff! Don't let this last season fool you. Chris Webber has had a very good career!
2007-08-20 15:09:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Muffin 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It that a question, if robinson is better than Webber he should be still playing after all he's younger
2007-08-20 14:01:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ronnie 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Chris Webber, he had better D than Glenn. also he was more athletic
2007-08-20 15:40:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by alvanlau90 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm glad you said,"Who WAS better" because they are much older and past their prime.Chris Webber was the bomb.He led his teams well enough,he just couldn't lead them to a championship.Glenn was OK,just not as good as C-Webb.
2007-08-20 15:33:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by M3TH☆DiCAL 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Webber by a mile.
2007-08-22 06:24:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by JR 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
G.Rob aka Big Dog! That dude was the bomb but he was stuck in MIL. Just like Michael Redd, nobody from Milwaukee get recognzed. I played on the Indiana All-Star team with Big Dog in 1991 and I remeber this same question. I also remember when C.Webb was at michigan and Big Dog was at Purdue and they asked the same question. My answer has never changed, Big Dog was always the best and, in my opinion, he will always be better then C. Webb
2007-08-20 15:16:28
·
answer #10
·
answered by Indy Finesse 3
·
1⤊
0⤋